Talk:Global 200

This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

List of Global 200

After spending time wikifying the whole list, I noticed that it's just a word-for-word copy and paste of one of the external links. I'm not sure what we should do with this, as there are a ton of wikilinks (though the majority are redlinks). As such, I've moved the list here for now: –Dvandersluis 17:40, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

The consensus at List of ecoregions (see Talk) seemed to be to leave List of ecoregions as a full list of WWF ecoregions, and this list as a list of WWF's Global 200 ecoregions. I am removing the "merge" template from this article. Tom Radulovich 18:00, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mangroves

The List of mangroves is not perfect. Sometimes you find some on the map, sometimes not. NT1427 Pará mangroves, NT1402 Amapa mangroves, NT1411 Guianan mangroves must be there, but I could not see them.

Neotropic: Guianan - Amazon mangroves

NT1401 Alvarado mangroves; NT1402 Amapa mangroves; NT1406 Belizean reef mangroves; NT1411 Guianan mangroves; NT1427 Pará mangroves

--Chris.urs-o (talk) 07:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congolian coastal forests

The Congolian coastal forests, are made up of Cross-Sanaga-Bioko coastal forests; Sao Tome and Principe moist lowland forests; and Atlantic Equatorial coastal forests. See here. --Mario1952 (talk) 14:15, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Global 200. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060712165839/http://www.panda.org/about_wwf/where_we_work/ecoregions/ecoregion_list/index.cfm to http://www.panda.org/about_wwf/where_we_work/ecoregions/ecoregion_list/index.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

podiam ter feito uma lista de estagios naturais bio geofisico-quimicos a partir das macro zonas virou uma salganhada de taifas confusa — Preceding unsigned comment added by 179.154.75.17 (talk) 17:45, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not the Global 200 list?

I'm a bit confused - this isn't the Global 200 as defined in the Olsen and Dinerstein 2002 paper. That paper uses different names and codes. Where does this list come from? There are no citations in the first few sections, and none for the list - except one to a broken WWF page for Congo forests.

Looking more, it appears this page based on the WWF Ecoregions https://www.worldwildlife.org/biomes. This is not the same thing as the Global 200. I suggest this Global 200 page lists the Global 200 ecoregions, as defined by Olsen and Dinerstein. If there should be a list of WWF Ecoregions, fine, but that should be under a different page. The citations for this page link to Olsen and Dinerstein, not the newer WWF Ecoregions.

Confusing for them to come out with several iterations, but the title of the page is clear - this is the Global 200.