Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moshing checklist
I've merged this article with Mosh at someone else's request. It is now no longer useful to have this version up. cprompt 20:46, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
Comment. There's no need to VfD this. Just turn it into a redirect: replace the entire article with #REDIRECT [[Mosh]]. This is likely to be used as a search term. (Note that mosh still needs cleanup, but that's not directly relevant here). JRM 20:53, 2004 Dec 8 (UTC)Oh, if you decide to do this, don't forget to "formally" retract your nomination here to prevent confusion. JRM 20:54, 2004 Dec 8 (UTC)
- It's really time for me to go to bed, or something. Of course "moshing checklist" is a nonsense title.
Delete. JRM 20:57, 2004 Dec 8 (UTC)- What Geogre said. Policy sez: Redirect. JRM 01:09, 2004 Dec 9 (UTC)
Delete:Sure, a person could make it a redirect, but not usefully so, especially if the author did the merge. Geogre 22:05, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)- I'm not the author of this article--I just merged it because someone tagged it to-be-merged. In fact, I think it could stand to be rewritten substantially. It didn't even occur to me to just redirect the article, which would certainly do no harm (even if it wouldn't be the most useful redirect.) --cprompt 23:40, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
- Like I said, I don't think anyone's going to use the redirect, but if you're not the author and you merged the content, we must redirect to preserve the edit history. Geogre 00:58, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Merge with Mosh. The content is entertaining and worth preserving.Delete Wyss 00:52, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)- Comment: It has already been merged. Geogre 00:58, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)