This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
This article is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen articles
So it seems that the entire history section is just dropped from the book Game Preview
which was published the same time as the original edits to this page. This appears to be a published and researched book of games with many of it own sources. But, it does seem like the author may have taken the language from Wikipedia (or possibly vice versa, but honestly I can't tell either way).
Basically does anyone think this works for the (very) needed citation in this section? Or does it look like it's a no go? MrGWillickers (talk) 08:38, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
