Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kadan kingdom

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 09:54, May 2, 2005 (UTC)

Kadan kingdom

Delete - I am the major author of the entry and I vote for deletion because although every single line of the article is right it is not a real encyclopaedia entry. I will try to correct my reputation with some real entries. I was just inspired by the Conch Republic that reminded me of our student country that still recalls good memories in several minds. Thank you all for the care and do not hesitate to delete it.Aloysius
- Want a reputation? Get an account! Septentrionalis 20:31, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all micronations. Rick K 05:51, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)
Delete all micronations. Master Thief Garrett 06:01, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable, cruft. Megan1967 06:37, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete TigerShark 14:38, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The existence of this supposed kingdom is completely unverifiable. Delete. Uncle G 20:07, 2005 Apr 24 (UTC)
Delete all micronations, as vanity. José San Martin 20:25, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)
- hm, maybe we should start a DeleteAllMicronationsist movement, and call in the heavies to merciless Delete-vote any and all that come up...! Master Thief Garrett 22:16, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Whether or not micronations are notable, encyclopedic, etc, this article is nonsense:

"The exact day is not given but it is usually celebrated today. There is, however, a numerous group of authorities who claim tomorrow to be the most feazible day of independence", "Dad Language" is an official language and its currency is "All the money of the world."

Hmmm. So, delete as nonsense. SteveW | Talk 22:59, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Keep unless Delete Micronations is declared policy, or better reasons can be given. Delete Better reasons have been given. Septentrionalis 23:34, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- What reasons could be better than a lack of notability and doubts about it being a real micronation in the first place? Master Thief Garrett 01:26, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

An I failing to follow something? Whatis the difference between a real micronation and a fake micronation? Septentrionalis 04:56, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

One exists...and the other doesn't? As this seems to be the latter, delete. A Man In Black 10:26, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Micronation for the most part exist only on paper, on the Internet, or in the minds of their creators. The article cites micronations down to a "two-decade old political simulation with several dozen members" and '"a two-person kingdom "ruled" by "His Imperial Most Gracious, Glorious and Holy Majesty, King/Emperor Edgard II"'.

So I repeat

what's the line? Why does the "Kadan Kingdom" not "exist"? Septentrionalis 22

40, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Non notable micronation. Sjakkalle 09:28, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thank you; this is the sort of real argument I was looking for. Septentrionalis 22:40, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.