Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuck in a Moment You Can't Get Out Of
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 06:22, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This article has limited potential for growth (it's a relatively minor song), and there seems to be very little interest in expanding it anyway. I intend to merge the useful information here with the All That You Can't Leave Behind article (the album from which this song is drawn).
--typhoon 07:18, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Mergeing would be a wonderful thing to do. EvilPhoenix
- Keep separate, no point nuking a decent song article like this. Kappa 07:53, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It's a single Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:19, May 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Merge and Redirect, one normal-sized article is better than lots of single-paragraph ones. --W(t) 14:28, 2005 May 14 (UTC)
- Keep. It's a single with some back-story I hadn't known before. There is some potential for more info in the future on the song's history, charts, and covers. DoubleBlue (Talk) 14:38, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. ✏ OvenFresh2 16:11, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep singles R Calvete 16:46, 2005 May 14 (UTC)
- Keep. A significant single. Acegikmo1 16:53, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Despite the title's grammatical incorrectness (it should be "Stuck in a Moment of Which You Can't Get Out"), it is a notable single. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 18:06, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- How about "...Out Of Which You Can't Get?" Kappa 18:30, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable single, #2 on the charts might even scrape in on its own but it's also a very relevant song to two notable biographies. I hope you're joking about changing the title. Andrewa 18:11, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Even if it weren't released as a single, it would still be a notable enough song on its own. sɪzlæk [ +t, +c ] 18:53, May 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Any widely released U2 single is eminently notable. Samaritan 19:42, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge Gmaxwell 21:24, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge The article for All That You Can't Leave Behind isn't so long as to be unwieldy. No information would be lost, and we'd have the song and its album-context together in one place. Joyous 21:33, May 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Merge. Don't make two pages instead of one when it creates two stubs. Harro5 21:57, May 14, 2005 (UTC)
- A stub about a single has more chance of growth if it isn't stuck in an album it can't get out of. Kappa 23:04, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with All That You Can't Leave Behind - plenty of space there for this song. Megan1967 04:02, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Plenty of space on Wikipedia for this article and this stub will encourage more detail on the single than would be appropriate on the album page. DoubleBlue (Talk) 04:15, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Good stub on hit single by notable band. Capitalistroadster 10:20, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep alone, good song article. Grue 18:48, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge. The song hasn't done anything to distinguish itself from the album. Dystopos 21:44, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge. I love U2, but I don't want articles on every song they wrote. →Iñgōlemo← talk 03:21, 2005 May 19 (UTC)
- Keep as per DoubleBlue. —Markaci 2005-05-21 T 17:22 Z
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.