Talk:Onion routing
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Onion routing article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 730 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
edit war
[edit]Please don't remove the (not to be confused with Onions and routing) from the page — Preceding unsigned comment added by CoolberryWiki (talk • contribs) 03:15, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- @CoolberryWiki You need to explain not only why the article needs it but why it needs to be there in a non-standard form. —C.Fred (talk) 03:16, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- FYI, @C.Fred, the user who said that is the one who repeatedly inserted this nonsense on the article - including while logged out. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 03:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- What if people think that onion routing is about onions CoolberryWiki (talk) 03:28, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- @CoolberryWiki The introduction provides sufficient context to make clear that's not the case. —C.Fred (talk) 03:29, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- @CoolberryWiki No one who would search for "onion routing" think it's about onions after reading the first sentence of the article. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 03:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- What if people think that onion routing is about onions CoolberryWiki (talk) 03:28, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- FYI, @C.Fred, the user who said that is the one who repeatedly inserted this nonsense on the article - including while logged out. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 03:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)