User talk:Jcbos

Welcome to the Wikipedia

Here are some links I thought useful:

Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. Wikipedia:About, Wikipedia:Help desk, and Wikipedia:Village pump are also a place to go for answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be Bold!

Sam Spade (talk · contribs) 11:09, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Email

Johan,

Als je aan niemand vertelt dat je een RFC hebt aangemaakt wordt elke "revert" uitgelegd als een "revert". >3x betekent geblokkeerd worden, volgens de "three revert rule".

Je moet echt stoppen met dit gedonder. Een korte blik op je overlegpagina op de nl.wikipedia geeft duidelijk weer dat je hetzelfde spelletje op NL speelt.

Ik heb je block ongedaan gemaakt, omdat je technisch gesproken niet 4x een revert hebt uitgevoerd. Toch wil ik je dringend verzoeken om te stoppen met dat Bijbel-gedoe. Heb je echt niets beters te doen (bijvoorbeeld inhoud?) JFW | T@lk 00:51, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

OK, hopelijk kan je nu wel bewerken.

Hopelijk heb ik een verkeerd beeld van je bedoelingen. Ik zei dat ik een korte blik op je overlegpagina had geworpen :-). Mbt de Bijbel-kwestie is er hier concensus dat "Christian Bible" géén pleonasme is. Ik denk dat we nu het beste de resultaten van WP:RFC kunnen afwachten. JFW | T@lk 06:15, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

OK, de blok is dus ongedaan gemaakt. Ik kan me voorstellen dat er op NL minder snel geblokt wordt, maar op EN bestaat de 3-revert regel. Ik was onder de indruk dat je op Bijbel 4x je eigen versie had gemaakt, en dat is zonder meer een reden voor een blok. Later zag ik dat het niet strikt genomen "reverts" waren, en heb ik je blok ongedaan gemaakt. Dit is "normaal" gebruik van moderator-status en absoluut geen grond voor het wegnemen van privileges. JFW | T@lk 17:41, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Request for Support

I've filed a complaint against user Jayjg for abuse of Admin powers and Anti-Arab bias. The link [[1]] will take you there. I see that you too have been subject to Jayjg's treatment, and I would appreciate any additional evidence you can provide.A.Khalil 02:46, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

To me he just showed troll-behaviour, he did not (yet) abuse his moderator privileges against me. Any user can revert someones edits. Jcbos 03:01, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Interlingua Wikipedia

Actually, I agree with many (not all!) blanking done by the user with the IP known as 24.70.95.206. Simple dictionary entries, original (religious) sources and other unencyclopedic entries have no place there. He's not always right though, so revert based on your own judgement. If you could even make the article encyclopedic, that would be even more great. -- Dissident (Talk) 04:15, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

On your new poll

Could you advertise it on the village pump and relevant contended pages areas? That'll help it have more validity. Thanks. --Improv 23:25, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

You cannot change the options once you've started the poll. Grouping the opinions can happen later. JFW | T@lk 12:09, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Answering annoying question

So I called him a troll. Big deal. It's not the most offensive word in the world. → JarlaxleArtemis 02:00, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)

It's not normal to abuse other Wikipediae to call EN.users names. And than, it's not normal that firstly you just deleted my question. Jcbos 02:39, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

If it's not "normal" to "abuse" people by describing them as "trolls", why did you do so here on your Talk: page, just 10 days ago? Jayjg ^(talk) 15:14, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I did not talk about abusing people, I talked about abusing IA.wikipedia for calling EN.users names. When someone shows troll-behaviour, there is nothing wrong to say that, but if you only say that hidden, then there is something wrong. Jcbos 21:34, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

You should be ashamed

It has come to my attention, that our sensei, Peter Lee, is a victim of vandalism and slander here at Wikipedia. I have removed those links, but to my surprise, I see that you have put this kind of links right back. May I ask why you would allow hosting of such slandering links?

Thank you Johan for undoing the vandalist actions by Peter Lee on my user page and some anonymous person who is even here afraid to tell his real name. There's of course NOTHING to be ashamed of! You did absolutely the right thing. There's a lot to do about this Peter Lee on Wikipedia. Not only on Wikipedia, also his own site is full of slander and lies about the true and original Genseiryu karate. Don't get too much involved though, 'cause it's very complex and it's for an outsider very difficult to separate the truth from the facts (almost like the Da Vinci Code! Just much more boring ;-) ). For insiders who do a little research, it becomes clear after a while that Peter Lee is the one who is really vandalizing and hanging up a bunch of lies to ground his reasons... For many years other people have become a victim of his slander, without any reaction from these people. Now that the truth is being told some people suddenly start wining about that... Don't pay any attention! Also I am not going to beg for help or anything, it would be unfair to drag you in this silly edit war. But it's totally up to you of course! So, thanks again and regards! -- MarioR 13:47, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bot activity

I was going over the list of bots and noticed that RobotJcb (talk · contribs) has not edited in a very long time. Is this bot still active and if not, would you object to it being de-flagged? Please post your comments to Wikipedia_talk:Bots/Requests_for_approval#Dead_bots since this is a rather widely-posted message. MBisanz ^talk 01:45, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

YL

Hoi JCB, ik zag je melding op wiki-nl. Vanwege de blokkade geef ik even hier een reactie. Ik heb van OTRS nooit een mail ontvangen dat ik aan het verkeerde adres was bij hun voor zover me bekend is. Wanneer is die mail verzonden? Met vriendelijke groet, 83.87.73.170 (talk) 09:49, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]