User talk:Q4

Welcome!

Hello, Q4, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Graham ☺ | Talk 07:51, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Tipit

Hi. Could you explain to me, please, what makes Tipit a notable S4C programme along the lines of Pobol y Cwm and Dechrau Canu, Dechrau Canmol? Thanks. Vashti 17:56, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Tipit

I don't know much about S4C, except for watching it whilst there on holiday!!! However, in the listed: "Pobol y Cwm," "Dechrau Canu, Dechrau Canmol" and of course "Tipit" - are three different programmes, a soap, a religious program and a game show respectively, meaning there is some notability in it being that it is one of the only game shows broadcast in Welsh. Richard n 21:13, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you answered this here? Are you User:Q4? Do you know Wikipedia has a strict policy against sockpuppetry, or having more than one account? I urge you to read it.

I find it odd that you've answered this question, are one of two people who added the Tipit link to S4C, and despite you "not knowing much about S4C", you and Q4 are also the only two editors to have worked on the Tipit page here! Regardless of any of this, please respect that we've already discussed in some detail what makes a programme a notable S4C programme, and just appearing on the channel or being an example of a genre is not enough. The programmes that remain are ones with historical interest - that is, they have run for decades.

You can see this discussion on the talk page at Talk:S4C; if you'd like to add to it, you're more than welcome to do so. I am also curious as to whether you have any connection with the programme, such as being on the production team; if so, issues of vanity come into play. Vashti 14:39, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise: I didn't realise! Richard n 20:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all; we were all new once, and Wiki policy can be a little arcane until you get used to it. :) Vashti 02:05, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What do you know

Hello, how well do you remember this programme? I think you may have a couple of details wrong... Rothorpe (talk) 22:55, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Castle Air

The article Castle Air has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article only has one source. It doesn't show that this company meets inclusion criteria.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fuortu (talk) 14:40, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Gethin Jones

Gethin Jones has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (trout me!) 01:55, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]