User talk:Dmccreary
Welcome!
[edit]- Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:
- If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
- Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
- You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
- You might want to add yourself to the New User Log
- If your first language isn't English, try Wikipedia:Contributing to articles outside your native language
- Full details on Wikipedia style can be found in the Manual of Style.
Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 17:47, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome! You might want to know that the Wikipedia:naming conventions generally suggest using lowercase in names except where required in proper names and other special cases.
Dan, I have made some proposals for sections in ISO/IEC 11179 related to naming to be moved to Data element name (discuss), and for Data element name and Data element definition to be merged into Data element (discuss). Let me know what you think.
RayGates 23:42, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Too many capitals
[edit]Please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style and my recent edits to level of measurement. You're using too many capitals in section headings. Michael Hardy 21:29, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Edit counter
[edit]Dan, you can include a link to an automatic edit counter as follows:
Edit counter.
RayGates 15:44, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Ultimate
[edit]You seem to be a big fan of a disambiguation page! Is this intended to keep the reader guessing? :) RayGates 18:56, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Original research
[edit]Dan, original research doesn't belong in Wikipedia but it is welcome at Wikisource. I'm sure you can put it up there. Ifnord 15:05, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Note: After I put the article on wikisource I was told to put it back on Wikipedia.
Hi Dan I saw your comment over at Wikisource and I am sorry you were given the above information as it is incorrect. Wikisource accepts research that has already been published only, therefore not original research. The article read like encylopedia article to me, which is probably why you were advised to put in on Wikipedia. However it seems there are objections to it over here. I understand why this has frustrated you, and I am sorry you had to put work into moving this article around. I left note at the AfD discussion so hopefully this will not happen to anyone else in the future.
I think your best options to preserve this information are to cite sources as much as possible and make it a sub-section on another economics page. Even with your best effforts however, it may still be significantly altered or deleted. That mainly depends on what kind of sources you are able to provide. Because if it truly is original research I do not know of anywhere it will be accepted. However the mathmatical models must be based on something so I think you should be able to put some of this information somewhere. I wish I knew more about the subject to give you more specific advice. If I can help you at all, please ask.--Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 15:16, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
- I am glad I have been able to make you feel a bit better about the situation. I suggested making a subsection of another article mainly because that answer the objection that it is a Neologism. I was also just thinking it might work as a section of Wiki rather than an economics article. Although I 'm sure some of info would fit in both places.--Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 18:28, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Dan. I agree with Birgitte. I apologize for this frustration--this sort of thing happens not uncommonly, unfortunately. Unfortunately, my only suggestion would be to find economics articles that relate to such things as you're talking about in the article. The math--did you devise it yourself or did you take it from somewhere else? Also, the benefits you refer to--did those come from another source or are they original? I'm just trying to brainstorm ways that will help you give your article more credibility so that it stands a better chance of surviving at a wiki, although I can't guarantee that that will be the case.—Zhaladshar (Talk) 18:39, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Request for edit summary
[edit]Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 5% for major edits and 28% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 60 minor edits in the article namespace.)
This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 21:02, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Semiotic
[edit]JA: Hi, thanks for the note. Plane in the morning so have to rush off. I think the actual triangle figure of the shape and labeling that one usually sees is due either to Charles W. Morris or to Ogden & Richards, and it was later a favorite figure of Walker Percy. The basic idea goes back to Aristotle's On Interpretation — if he drew figures we have lost them. Like the use of figures in geometry, though, the semiotic triangle can be misleading, especially if one thinks that a sign relation is a single triple (o, s, i) instead of being usually a whole set of them. You might want to take a look at this fine paper:
- Awbrey, Jon, and Awbrey, Susan (1995), "Interpretation as Action: The Risk of Inquiry", Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 15, 40–52. Eprint
JA: Bye for a while, talk to ya later. Jon Awbrey 04:48, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for log graph
[edit]Thanks for updating the log graph of wikipedia's English growth. I'm amazed at how straight the line is! Andjam 00:26, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- How about starting off with an article within your user space, eg "User:Dmccreary/Wikipedia growth" and advertise the essay in Wikipedia talk:Modelling Wikipedia's growth. If enough people like it, someone may decide to link from a Wikipedia: page to the essay. I don't know anything about semantic wikis, so I can't help you there. Andjam 13:22, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
I would write a letter to the editor of my local paper relating my experience. — goethean ॐ 19:57, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Minnesota meetup
[edit]A meetup of Wikipedians in Minnesota is proposed: please stop by the discussion page if interested. Jonathunder 01:54, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Reminder: Meetup October 29, one o'clock, Mall of America. Jonathunder 20:08, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Technology evangelist merged; please help
[edit]I have merged your work at Technology evangelist with Technical evangelist. You might like to drop by and copyedit the new combined article. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 10:49, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Dan, I have come across this article you wrote. Please can you provide links to examples of this style of registry, or site other sources. I have never heard of this before, and I have been involved with ISO/IEC 11179 for 10 years. Thank you. RayGates 23:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Minnesota Meetup
[edit]Meetup
[edit]Hi, Dmccreary. Someone wearing a dark colored t-shirt took photos at the meetup. Was that you by any chance? -Susanlesch (talk) 15:47, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- OK. Thanks much for your quick reply. Hope to have a chance to speak with you in person next time. Cheers. -Susanlesch (talk) 17:30, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Castor (software), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}}
to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Berserkerus (talk) 14:07, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Reusing data
[edit]Hello, Dmccreary. Sorry to ping about something I know nothing about. I promise to play my old lady card next. You might be interested in this discussion and poll. It came up in Minneapolis, Minnesota somewhere back its talk pages that I thought WP:CITET templates would help. But today, in light of past experience (they haven't been used as a matched set since I joined and fields drop in and out on individual templates) I'm not sure. I also sent a note to the Technology & Society department at W3C but that was cluttered with other topics. Best wishes. -SusanLesch (talk) 20:54, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Minneapolis Meetups
[edit]Town Hall Brewery maps.google.com 1430 Washington Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55454 (612) 339-8696 October 11, 2008 Saturday at 12:00 noon (midday) Meetup RSVP
Muddy Waters maps.google.com 2401 Lyndale Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55405 (612) 872-2232 October 10, 2008 Friday at 10:00 PM (at night) Alternate meetup RSVP
Hope you can make it. Feel free to pass along these invitations. -SusanLesch (talk) 17:54, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Syntactica
[edit]A tag has been placed on Syntactica requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:23, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Credit Administration Program
[edit]A tag has been placed on Credit Administration Program requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ipatrol (talk) 00:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Minnesota Meetup
[edit]- Update: the meetup will be at 1 p.m. Sunday, October 11, in St. Paul. Click here for more details and to R.S.V.P. Jonathunder (talk)
AfD nomination of Quantity (metadata)
[edit]An article that you have been involved in editing, Quantity (metadata), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantity (metadata). Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jeepday (talk) 00:35, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
The article Amount (metadata) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- A search for references did not find support for the term "Amount" to have any significant meaning in Metadata, delete per WP:N, WP:V, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantity (metadata)
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 23:57, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Annotea
[edit]I have nominated Annotea, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annotea. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Marasmusine (talk) 14:13, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Annotea
[edit]I have nominated Annotea, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annotea (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Marasmusine (talk) 05:59, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Meetup
[edit]Hello. Discussion of a 2010 Minnesota Wikipedia Meetup has begun. Please see the talk page. Jonathunder (talk) 23:20, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Edit-a-thon at Hennepin County Library
[edit]- Minneapolis History edit-a-thon
The Minnesota Wikipedia community and local historians are invited to edit entries in Wikipedia on Minneapolis history. Please help increase the depth of information on Minneapolis history topics by utilizing materials in the Minneapolis Collection. Find your own Minneapolis History topics to edit or work from a list developed by Special Collections Librarians.
Where: Minneapolis Central Library, 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis
When: Saturday, February 25, 2012, 10-5 pm
10 am - 11 am Orientation to Minneapolis Collection
11 am - 5 pm Edit-a-thon
Website: Hennepin County Library, Special Collections, Map & Directions
Parking: Metered street parking or pay ramp in basement, enter on 4th Ave
For more information see Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Minnesota#2012. —innotata 00:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Invitation to event: bot, template, and Gadget makers wanted
[edit]I thought you might want to know about some upcoming MediaWiki & Wikimedia developers' events (such as the Berlin hackathon in June), where you can learn more about MediaWiki customization and development, extending functionality with JavaScript, the future of mw:ResourceLoader and Gadgets, the new Lua templating system, how to best use the web API for bots, and various upcoming features and changes. We'd love to have power users, bot maintainers and writers, and template makers at these events so we can all learn from each other and chat about what needs doing. Best wishes! - Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation's Volunteer Development Coordinator Sumanah (talk) 14:16, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
The article Ski boat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No references
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JayJayTalk to me 04:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Great American Wiknic
[edit]In the area? You're invited to the Great American Wiknic.
Place: near Minnehaha Falls at Minnehaha Park, Minneapolis
Date: Saturday, July 7, 2012 (rain date July 8)
Time: 12–3 pm
- Accessible from the Minnehaha Park light rail station, bus, walk, bike, or car
- If driving, free parking available at 46th Ave. S, and pay parking in the park
- Food and drink options nearby, or bring your own... maybe even to share!
See the meetup talk page for more. —innotata 00:03, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia Loves Libraries event
[edit]In the area? You are invited to Wikipedia Loves Libraries in Minneapolis.
Hennepin County Library's Special Collections is hosting a Minneapolis history editathon on November 3. Help increase the depth of information on Minneapolis history topics by using materials in the Minneapolis Collection. Find your own topics to edit or work from a list developed by Special Collections librarians.
There will also be an intro for people new to Wikipedia, and tours of Special Collections.
Where: Minneapolis Central Library, 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis
Special Collections (4th floor)
When: 10am-4:30pm, Saturday, November 3, 2012
For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page. —innotata 14:47, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
The article Year (metadata) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- trivial topic, unlikely to have any sources at all — none given since at least 2009, anyway
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Keφr (talk) 04:36, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Cast Iron (disambiguation)
[edit]A tag has been placed on Cast Iron (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
- disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Altered Walter (talk) 16:43, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Standby Equity Distribution Agreement for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Standby Equity Distribution Agreement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Standby Equity Distribution Agreement until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Geoff Who, me? 02:04, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Upcoming Wikipedia meetups
[edit]In the area? You are invited to the upcoming Minnesota meetups.
To kick-off monthly meetups in the Twin Cities, two events will be held in Special Collections at Minneapolis Central Library this summer. These are mostly planned as opportunities for Wikipedians to discuss editing, but all are welcome!
Special Collections contains many valuable historical resources, including the Minneapolis Collection, consisting of files on hundreds of topics related to Minneapolis from neighborhoods to politicians (it's best to call or email in advance to request materials). Free wifi and several public computers are available.
Place: Minneapolis Central Library, 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis
Special Collections (4th floor)
Dates: Saturday, June 1
Saturday, July 6
Time: 12:30pm–2:30pm+
For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page.
This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list. —innotata 14:05, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Great American Wiknic
[edit]In the area? You're invited to the Great American Wiknic.
Place: north of Minnehaha Falls in Minnehaha Park, Minneapolis
Date: Saturday, June 22, 2012
Time: 12–4 pm
- Accessible from the Minnehaha Park METRO station, bus, walk, bike, or car
- If driving, free parking available on 46th Ave. S, and pay parking in the park
- Food and drink options nearby, or bring your own... maybe even to share!
For more, and to sign up (encouraged, not required) go to the meetup talk page.
This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list. —innotata 03:07, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Minnesota Wikipedia Meetup on August 3
[edit]In the area? You are invited to the upcoming Minnesota monthly meetup on August 3.
Place: Lavvu Coffee House
813 4th St SE, Minneapolis 55414
Date: Saturday, August 3
Time: 1:00pm-3:00pm+
For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page.
This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list.
—innotata 23:40, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia Day Meetup on January 18
[edit]In the area? You are invited to the upcoming Minnesota meetup in commemoration of Wikipedia Day.
- Place: Seward Cafe
- 2129 E Franklin Ave, Minneapolis, MN 55404
- Date: Saturday, January 18, 2014
- Time: noon
- Place: Seward Cafe
For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page.
This invitation was sent to users who were interested in past events. If you don't want to receive future invitations, you can remove your name from the invite list. —innotata 04:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Metadata Registry listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Metadata Registry. Since you had some involvement with the Metadata Registry redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Compfreak7 (talk) 15:10, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Data architect
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Data architect requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.captechconsulting.com/blog/bob-lambert/skills-the-data-architect. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Quinto Simmaco (talk) 08:16, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Castor (software)
[edit]The article Castor (software) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- unreferenced software article of unclear notability, tagged as unreferenced since 2010
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dialectric (talk) 15:10, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Invite to the Minneapolis Institute of Art
[edit]Minneapolis Institute of Art edit-a-thon | |
---|---|
|
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Invite to an edit-a-thon at the Loft Literary Center
[edit]The Loft Literary Center edit-a-thon | |
---|---|
|
- We have also recently formed a user group for Minnesota editors. If you would like to join, please add your name to our page on meta. Thank you, gobonobo + c 22:58, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Semantic Wiki Information Management
[edit]The article Semantic Wiki Information Management has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yaron K. (talk) 04:55, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Dmccreary. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The article Representation class has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Dicdef, unsourced, completely untouched since 2006
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:56, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Daybreak-Maxfield-Parrish.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Daybreak-Maxfield-Parrish.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:45, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Comparison of photo gallery software for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comparison of photo gallery software is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of photo gallery software until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:49, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Dmccreary. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Dmccreary. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of INtelligent Data Understanding System for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/INtelligent Data Understanding System until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
StarM 17:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Comparison of photo gallery software for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of photo gallery software (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Greatder (talk) 06:44, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of XML appliance for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XML appliance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.