Talk:Kitana

Kitana was a Video games good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 12, 2012	Peer review	Reviewed
November 5, 2012	Good article nominee	Not listed

Current status: Former good article nominee

Video games: Characters Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Video game characters task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Kitana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:21, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Kitana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:26, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kitana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Theres no header image currently

--5.173.104.162 (talk) 17:47, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks for pointing it out. --Krótki (talk) 19:11, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sex appeal

This has to be one of the funniest articles I've ever had the misfortune of reading. Does anybody object to trimming down the paragraphs of trashy listicles about which video game characters have the best boobs? It makes me wonder if other female fighting game character articles are this bad. XeCyranium (talk) 01:15, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reception section

I don't know if this is a video game character article or pornographic actress, the reception is full of nonsense like sexiest female characters/babes, fucktality, nudality and full of horny sources. Sorry if it sounds rude 😕 39.50.240.149 (talk) 16:33, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kung Fu Man @Beemer69 @Greenish Pickle! @MoonJet I hope you guys do a better job and make this article less messier than Lionel Messi 😌 39.50.235.97 (talk) 19:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've been meaning to tinker with that section for a long time. In addition to what you mentioned, a good chunk of that section is now either nonviable or outdated. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 05:20, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A suggestion I have is that you could combine a few of these sentences into one general sentence about reviewers thinking the character is sexy. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:49, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]