Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/AntonioMartin

AntonioMartin

Vote here (0/11/1) ending 06:20, 04 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I self-nominate myself because the title sounds cool, and because I believe I have the maturity to handle the work bureocrats do.

Support

Oppose

1. If the nominee wishes a position of responsibility which requires a knowledge of Wikipedia procedure and the confidence of the community, it would help if he started by reading the instructions on how to format a request, which is spelled out plainly at the head of the page. Following that, I would like a more germane reason that he wants to be a "bureocrat" than that the title "sounds cool." I am sorry to have this sound unavoidably hostile, as he seems like a really nice person and a good Wikipedian, but this self-nom almost seems like a joke. -- Cecropia | explains it all ® 08:33, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
2. Simply because the request contradicts itself by displaying an apparent lack of maturity; "sounds cool" indeed! Filiocht 09:33, Nov 3, 2004 (UTC)
3. No, because you mucked up the page. -- [[User:Bobdoe|BobDoe]] 09:50, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
4. Bureaucrats should be able to spell "bureaucrat". Gdr 13:08, 2004 Nov 3 (UTC)
5. I have to agree with Cecropia here. Skyler1534 17:55, Nov 3, 2004 (UTC)
6. Your user page's list of "100 famous women [you]'d do" suggests that you don't have the maturity. I vote no. —tregoweth 19:14, Nov 3, 2004 (UTC)
7. You seem like a nice guy, but your error in formatting the request, your lack of proper datestamping on talk and Wikipedia pages, and your very lack of a legitimate reason to become a bureaucrat count against you and I must oppose. I do think that you're a strong contributor, but bureaucrat is a position that deals with adminship and policy. Andre (talk) 23:05, Nov 3, 2004 (UTC)
8. What everyone else said. Show you're a little more serious about the position, and maybe we can take your nomination a little more seriously. Shane King 23:22, Nov 3, 2004 (UTC)
9. For all the reasons given above. It's good to have you contributing to Wikipedia, and I hope you will continue to do so, but you should be able to provide more reasons for wanting to become a bureaucrat, not just that "the title sounds cool". -- Schnee 01:11, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
10. For the reasons given above. -- Emsworth 14:45, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
11. Ditto everybody (well, almost).—Ëzhiki (erinaceus europeaus) 15:21, Nov 4, 2004 (UTC)

Neutral

1. ¡Hola mi buen amigo Antonio! Don't get me wrong your a great user and so is your father, but personally I'd like you to read about bureucratship and see if you're up to it.--[[User:Plato|Comrade Nick @)---^--]] 11:00, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)