User talk:Moochocoogle

Hi.

I added an entry under the word "popscene" regarding a major Britpop club of the Nineties. I've been researching the topic for an upcoming book and noticed wiki didn't have anything on the subject.

Jusy wondered why it was deleted?

Regards, Jason Klinston

Hello,

I noticed that you joined Wikipedia about a month ago. Welcome! I've seen your work on Blur / British culture articles and found it to be very good. Please keep it up!

Sincerely,

Acegikmo1 01:40, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Thanks, I'm still finding my feet here. It's nice to be recocnised.--Moochocoogle 00:39, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Asteroids

If you want help in filling out Asteroid infoboxes, see File:AstOrbBrowser1.11.zip.

Urhixidur 21:13, 2004 Sep 21 (UTC)

The old image listed above has been deleted. Fetch version 1.20 from my personal home page instead.

Urhixidur 17:31, 2005 Mar 8 (UTC)

Edit summary

Hello. Please provide an edit summary. Thanks and happy edits. Hyacinth 07:40, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome!

Thanks, I'm still kinda new to the site. There's a lot of music stuff I'll end up working on when I have the time.

Cheers,

--Madchester 04:33, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Electric Six

Did you see Electric Six at the Solus on Thursday? I ask 'cause I note your edits both at their article and the Radio Ga Ga one; of course, if you're more of a Queen fan maybe you wouldn't have gone...

No, I didn't go to see Electric Six (I'm not really a fan) but my odd housemates did (one of them was wearing a wetsuit - no, really, he was). --Moochocoogle 02:24, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

David Bowie albums

Album titles in italics? Why? And why you've edited only two albums? There are twenty more to do

Avel791 19:10, May 28, 2005 (UTC)

Album titles always go in italics (see Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums). As for why only two: I'm afraid I don't have infinate wiki-time and can't do everything in one go. --Moochocoogle 22:26, 29 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Blur - copyvio

Hello, I notice you've done a lot of work on Blur. I just noticed that large swathes of the article are directly plagiarized from the Allmusic.com article on Blur. This seems to have been done by User:Painbearer, although I'm not completely certain. Thought I should let you know, since you've done a lot of work on the page. john k 02:27, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Uh, Painbearer. I would expect he is the culprit as I have found copyvios from him before. The article is quite big and changing it is going to be a big task. Thanks for the info - I'll see what I can do. --Moochocoogle 13:54, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Beatles Singles

Hi Moochocoogle. Recently you have been removing Beatles singles from the category "The Beatles Songs" and placing them in the category "The Beatles Singles." I think it's a great idea to categorize their singles so they're easy to access together, but perhaps it would be best to also leave them in categorized as Beatles songs. After all, a Beatles single is a Beatles song. Okay, that's all. Thanks!

Yes, but you could put any article in its category's parent category. The categories are a tree and i think it's fairly clear that X artist's singles would be in the sucategory labelled X singles inside X songs. --Moochocoogle 29 June 2005 18:19 (UTC)

Ace of Spades

I can see your reason for merging and re-directing the 88 version of AoS to the earlier version. I've reverted the edits as they both have their own places in the discography and timeline, it is not just a re-issue case. Alf 15:14, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You might have noticed that cover versions of a song don't even get their own articles, individual releases of a song by the same artist really don't deserve their own articles. The live singles articles contained little information. I'm listing your live articles on VfD to solve this dispute. --Moochocoogle 22:12, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tell truth, your redirects were poor, you removed lyrics, pictures and formats. VfD as a reply is a bit knee-jerkey. Alf 11:37, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, you did merge, you didn't state why anywhere, the merges, as they were, were just too confusing (IMHO), had you pointed me to the ongoing discussion you are involved in, I might have not reverted so quick, however I hope the current weight of opinions on their VfDs makes you aware I am not in the minority in viewing these particular things as individual articles, whatever rules are agreed on. Alf 23:54, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, communication is not one of my strong points. I did say what i was doing in the edit summary but i probably should have commented on the discussion page. I still believe that one article is best in this case and will continue to argue for it. Maybe we should have this debate in full on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Songs talk page. --Moochocoogle 11:59, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A question about templates

I saw that the article of The Beatles, Blur, and others have a template with some pics (Beatles only) and information about the band members, managers, producers, etc. very useful indeed. This box is also used in every release they had. So, I wonder whether it would be possible to do the same thing with other less popular bands. If that’s the case, I would be really grateful if you could point me to the right direction so that I could learn how to create this box for other bands. I have no idea how to copy the format. Regards, Luis María Benítez 12:49, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well I didn't create the Blur one from scratch. I think I made it by editing the REM one. Just go to a template article (e.g. Template:Blur), copy the code to your template (Template:<band name>) and edit it for your needs. Good luck. --Moochocoogle 13:34, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Songs

Hi. I've created a new infobox, Template:Single infobox2, and have started a discussion about it at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Songs#New_single_infobox. I was wondering if you could comment on it, as you seem to contribute to that WikiProject a lot. Also, another user has expressed some concerns over this edit you made recently to the guidelines of the WikiProject, and has started a discussion here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Songs#EM.2C_don.27t_revert_.28neautrality.29. Extraordinary Machine 22:49, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Song categories (Tony Bennett, Billie Holiday, etc)

Thanks for clearing up the sort order, I'd forgotten to do that. Cdyson37 | (Talk) 14:35, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I quite like organising categories. :P --Moochocoogle 14:37, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I got a small question, what's Category:Þeyr songs supposed to be about? -- (☺drini♫|☎) 01:40, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No idea what Þeyr is - there's no article for the artist/band. But Category:Þeyr singles was already there and to fit with the conventions of the songs project I created a parent category. --Moochocoogle 16:14, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Picture Gallery

Thanks for creating the picture gallery for the covers I uploaded. I couldn't think of what to do with all those variations but put them into the infobox. Fantailfan 01:00, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No probs - it is nice to include all the different covers. Keep up the good work. --Moochocoogle 01:05, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sockpuppets

Hi Moochocoogle, has anyone ever accused you of being a sockpuppet before, particularly of Wonderfool? I've noticed that we have quite an overlap of material we're writing about, and are both from similar places. --Thewayforward 10:18, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, I've never been accused of being a sockpuppet. --Moochocoogle 17:52, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sorry you missed the debate

I left the debate out in several places for over a month before putting it up on CfD, hoping to catch everyone's opinions before we proceeded one way or the other. I should've expected that someone wouldn't see it, but I never imagined it would be the Singles by artist structure's creator. Anyway, as you can see, a lot of people found the split confusing and difficult to maintain, and I expect that would be true for ALL schemes that broke up Songs by artist. So I can't say I support the split you propose either. But by all means bring it up on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs and see what people say.--Mike Selinker 01:06, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cover Songs

You recently left a comment regarding the poor state of the List of cover songs by artist page. I agree that it is in shambles and I aim to do something about it. I am, however, at a loss as to how exactly to organize it and if I should possibly consider a name revision. Thoughts?

I left similar comments on its discussion page as well but was unsure if you'd see them. I am in need of assistance here and since you've edited mostly music (as have I) I figured you'd be able to help.

jk 13:43, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Parallel Universe.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Parallel Universe.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Oops. Done now. --Moochocoogle 21:16, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rings Around the World cover.jpg

Hi Moochocoogle. This is just to let you know that the image you uploaded, Image:Rings Around the World cover.jpg is now orphaned (ie not used in any articles) and because it is a fair use image which has been replaced by Image:SFA-Rings Around the World.png, it will be deleted in seven days. zzuuzz ^(talk) 04:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Age category

Hello! If you are receiving this message, that means that your user page is in a specific year category. Per a recent user-category per deletion, all specific year categories are to be deleted. If you wish to continue using year categories, you have two options:

Using an age group category, such as Category:Wikipedians in their 30s
Using a decade category, such as Category:Wikipedians born in the 1970s.

If you wish, you may do both. Hopefully, this change in categorization will be quick and painless. Happy editing! --An automated message from MessedRobot 13:08, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Fopp.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Fopp.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:27, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Beetlebum_2.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Beetlebum_2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 02:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Blur_Beetlebum_CD1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Blur_Beetlebum_CD1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 02:50, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Coffee_-_TV_cover.jpg

I have tagged Image:Coffee_-_TV_cover.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 12:05, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:She's_So_High_12_Vinyl_cover.jpg

I have tagged Image:She's_So_High_12_Vinyl_cover.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 15:42, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blur_Bang.jpg

I have tagged Image:Blur_Bang.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 15:44, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Popscene.jpg

I have tagged Image:Popscene.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 15:44, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Girls_&_Boys_CD2.jpg

I have tagged Image:Girls_&_Boys_CD2.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 15:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Parklife_cover.jpg

I have tagged Image:Parklife_cover.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 15:47, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:End_of_a_Century.jpg

I have tagged Image:End_of_a_Century.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 15:47, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Country_House_CD_single.jpg

I have tagged Image:Country_House_CD_single.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 15:48, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blur_song_2_CD1.jpg

I have tagged Image:Blur_song_2_CD1.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 15:50, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mor_7vinyl_cover.jpg

I have tagged Image:Mor_7vinyl_cover.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 15:51, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:I_Should_Coco.jpg

I have tagged Image:I_Should_Coco.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Alpta 20:26, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Take me out cd single.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Take me out cd single.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:53, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Franz Ferdinand (album).jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Franz Ferdinand (album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. 17Drew 18:39, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tender 4.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tender 4.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rush Hour Soul.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rush Hour Soul.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:45, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kaiser Chiefs Employment.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kaiser Chiefs Employment.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:06, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Supergrass (album).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Supergrass (album).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:REMIX cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:REMIX cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Spectacular.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Spectacular.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:46, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Life_On_Other_Planets.jpg

I have tagged Image:Life_On_Other_Planets.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 11:27, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:In view.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:In view.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:16, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:In It For The Money.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:In It For The Money.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sexie.jpg

I have tagged Image:Sexie.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 04:17, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Parallel Universe.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Parallel Universe.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 13:22, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:All Over Me.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:All Over Me.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bittersweet Bundle Of Misery.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bittersweet Bundle Of Misery.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:25, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Black tie white noise cover.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Black tie white noise cover.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:01, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Blur Best Of.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Blur Best Of.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Blur special cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Blur special cover.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Breakes Beatific Visions.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Breakes Beatific Visions.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:30, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Paranoid Android CD2.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Paranoid Android CD2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Paranoid Android CD2.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Papa November (talk) 09:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:VEGC album cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:VEGC album cover.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TenderCD2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TenderCD2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:34, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Threatmantics

A tag has been placed on Threatmantics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Huadpe (talk) 16:28, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Obitus in game shot.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Obitus in game shot.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 23:31, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Bang 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bang 1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 16:07, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Hot Rats

A tag has been placed on The Hot Rats requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. otherl left 15:12, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I read your talkpage rationale, and future notability doesn't hold water around here. I'd be happy to userify the page if you wish, you can then move it to the mainspace once the band meets the notability guidelines. tedder (talk) 02:08, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disregard that! I made one more pass through the page, and realized it is notable under rule #6 of WP:BAND, "# Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a member of two or more independently notable ensembles." tedder (talk) 02:13, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:DotV box scan.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:DotV box scan.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:29, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Deuteros title.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Deuteros title.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:16, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Thanks for the Memory.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Thanks for the Memory.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:57, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Stasis Leak.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Stasis Leak.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:59, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Queeg.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Queeg.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:01, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

John Hutton (The Right Honourable) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect John Hutton (The Right Honourable). Since you had some involvement with the John Hutton (The Right Honourable) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:23, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Transcopic Records

The article Transcopic Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non Notable record company.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codf1977 (talk) 14:00, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Transcopic Records for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Transcopic Records, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transcopic Records until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Codf1977 (talk) 15:54, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rush (The Pillows song) for deletion

The article Rush (The Pillows song) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rush (The Pillows song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Albacore (talk) 16:17, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Jongleurs, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kingston and Lee Evans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GleeClubLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GleeClubLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:02, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Children's songs

Category:Children's songs, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 20:31, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of nomination for deletion of 2013 Vauxhall helicopter crash

This is to inform you that this article has been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 Vauxhall helicopter crash. - Ahunt (talk) 15:04, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Beautifulfreak.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beautifulfreak.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Moochocoogle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:5 Doctors DVD original cvr.png

The file File:5 Doctors DVD original cvr.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free DVD cover art used in a decorative manner in The Five Doctors#Commercial releases. Non-free cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about the work in question, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular DVD cover anywhere in the article, so there's no justification provided for its non-free use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:21, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Moochocoogle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Doctor Who Survival DVD.png

Thank you for uploading File:Doctor Who Survival DVD.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:33, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Blur song 2 CD1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Blur song 2 CD1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:R.E.M. - It's the End of the World as We Know It (And I Feel Fine) (United States).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:R.E.M. - It's the End of the World as We Know It (And I Feel Fine) (United States).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jongleurs logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jongleurs logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Out of Time DVD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Out of Time DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:46, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Keep Pushin'" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Keep Pushin' and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 29#Keep Pushin' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:47, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Coffee - TV cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Coffee - TV cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Weevil (Torchwood) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Weevil (Torchwood) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weevil (Torchwood) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:36, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Better Than Life.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Better Than Life.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Dronebogus (talk) 00:58, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]