Talk:Arctium

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Diction

It's confusing to say this is "native to the Old World." It would be clearer to say which specific areas it was native to and when. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prell (talk • contribs) 13:45, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gobou

I redirected Gobou to this page because, so far as I can tell, it's just the Japanese word for the same plant. A better botanist than I might have something clearer to say on the subject.

Arctium lappa is defined as Gobo in Japanese page as well, so I think it is alright. Revth 15:02, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

usage in Canadian Maritimes

I had been led to believe the word "Burdock" was unique the Maritime provinces of New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and PEI.

Canadians in other provinces call them "Burrs".

Picture

There's a good free picture from the Probert Encyclopaedia located here.

Odd trait

It will produce flowers and set seeds after its leaves have been killed by a defoliant

Burdock is able to produce stems, flowers, and seeds after its foliage has been killed by a defoliant. PixOnTrax 06:50, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This plant is located about six feet (2 m) away from railroad tracks. Workers sprayed a defoliant along the railroad's right-of-way to keep it free of weeds and young trees. PixOnTrax 07:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This photograph was made about 3 months after the defoliant had been applied to the plant. PixOnTrax 07:20, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Had the plant not been defoliated it would have produced about 10 times more seeds than those shown in the photograph. Setting flowers and producing seeds after the foliage has been killed is an odd trait possessed by burdock. PixOnTrax 07:40, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is not so odd. Most plants - as long as the root is alive and contains enough nutrients to start to regrow the plant will behave in a similar way. Dandelions are notoriously difficult to eradicate from a lawn because of the deep root and the plant regrowing from it. i have seen trees cut down and next thing from the side of the trunk left above the ground start a dozen of sprouting saplings.80.99.38.199 (talk) 08:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Photos if you'd like them

http://www.flickr.com/photos/cpurrin1/224594284/in/set-1755337/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/cpurrin1/389633647/in/set-1755337/

The above photos are licensed for non-commercial use only, and cannot be used on Wikipedia. Wikipedia can only accept images that are free licensed. TomTheHand 12:16, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Safety

Under sction safety we have this:

Do not gather burdock in the wild unless you know what you are doing.

What is the problem with wild Burdock roots? Is this even true? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.89.166.51 (talk) 14:45, August 26, 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 22:07, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move "Greater burdock" stuff to its article

Since this article has evolved into a general overview of the Arctium genus, most of the information that is specific to the Greater burdock (Japanese gobo), such as culinary uses, should be moved to that article. --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 18:34, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, but I am removing the merger templates because there should not be just one article. Nadiatalent (talk) 13:17, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

I removed text that was copy and pasted from the University of Maryland Medical Center. The text that was copied is part of the first paragraph under the Overview section. -- Joel M.Chat ✐ 18:53, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That may well have been taken from Wikipedia originally. The safety section (which I just removed) was, in an earlier version, verbatim with text on the UMMC website. I'd be willing to add the safety section back if I was sure I could cite UMMC as the original source, but I'm very skeptical of the claim that Atropa is uniquely likely to be confused with burdock, and am more inclined to think it originated in Wikipedia than UMMC. Copyvio's can go both ways; Wikipedia is often copied these days.Plantdrew (talk) 00:16, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Safety section

I'm removing the Safety section, which reads:

"Because the roots of burdock resemble those of deadly nightshade (also known as belladonna or Atropa belladonna), which is extremely poisonous, it is sometimes cautioned as a safety risk. Given that the plants above ground are readily distinguishable, and chiefly because their habitats rarely overlap, it is unlikely that the toxic plant's root should be found beneath the foliage of the edible one's. However, positive identification is a necessary precondition to the consumption of any wild plant."

Accidentally getting the roots of the wrong plant is certainly a risk when harvesting roots. Lots of roots look alike, but there is no reason to think (and no reference to support) Atropa roots (specifically) being often confused with burdock. This looks like a piece of Wikilore that escaped into the wild; I can't find any mention of belladonna being confused with burdock when doing a blog search on Google prior to 2007 (when the safety section was added), but it's all over the blogosphere now. I did find anecdotes about Datura poisonings when people thought they were consuming burdock ([1][2]), and am wondering if a garbled version of one of those poisonings is the source of the apparent myth (Datura is in the deadly nightshade family).Plantdrew (talk) 23:59, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Arctium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100717095144/http://www.nlm.nih.gov:80/medlineplus/druginfo/natural/patient-burdock.html to http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/natural/patient-burdock.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:21, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Arctium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:54, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Traditional use section

"is used in Europe as a scalp treatment.[citation needed]" - i am not sure, how one gets a scientifically trustworthy 2nd or 3rd level source to prove that there is an oil in commercial sale that is said to contain arctium/burdock extract and is supposed to be put on peoples heads, but searching for "kletten wurzel haar öl" produced quite a few hits and klettenwurzel seems to be the german name for arctium/burdock extract.80.99.38.199 (talk) 08:24, 1 October 2017 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arctium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151003010339/http://caledoniaspirits.com/dont-cut-your-burdock-down/ to http://caledoniaspirits.com/dont-cut-your-burdock-down/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:28, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]