User talk:Nick04
Nick - don't want to sound picky. Just read your Maggie Simpson article. Did she not speak, saying the word "Santa" in an episode where Mr.Burns breaks into the Simpson household in an attempt to kill Abe?
Nick - just read your comments on Npls spectrum, and agree wholeheartedly. Infact, I go slightly further, and have proposed that the article be deleted. Please take a look at its section on the VfD page and give your view. Thanks, Cal T 20:00, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Speedy deletion
[edit]I think that we were both adding the "candidate for speedy deletion" tag to Liquid waste product at the same time, so mine replaced yours. Not that it makes a difference, just thought you might like to know. Auricfuzz
(comments last scrubbed: 3rd Feb 2005)
I have substantially cleaned up the Truelove Eyre article based on the references that User:DragonflySixtyseven found, and have removed the spurious claims about the Eyre Empire etc. I am changing my vote to keep: can I persuade you to do the same? Thanks! GeorgeStepanek\talk 01:41, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Done, done, and done. Thanks for the edits. Nick04 08:56, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Please don't base your decision on the ludicrous Eyre Empire article. Yes, there was a lot of rubbish in this article too, but I have removed that now, and the references show that remaining content is verifiable. Please check the references before you make a final decision. GeorgeStepanek\talk 23:47, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- To be honest, looking over the Eyre Empire article in its current form, I'm still resolved to keep my vote at delete. I see no references at all - and an awful lot of spurious content (which goes so far as claiming Bill Clinton descended from the Eyres - which I'd happily go along with, if anybody care to provide a reference). Now this presents me with a problem - I don't think the Truelove Eyre article deserves to be on wikipedia, given it's clearly stated Wikipedia is not a genealogy resource, and the opening sentence clearly states "The figure of Truelove (or True Love) appears in geneologies". It's a very hard decision to make, but all I see on the Truelove page at the moment is a family legend, and not a famous one at that. I'm sticking with my original original decision of delete. Nick04 16:17, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I take your point about the geneology issue. I see him as notable for his supposed intervention in a critical historical event, but I admit that the story is, at best, apocryphal. As for the Eyre Empire, that is clearly rubbish, and I myself voted delete in the strongest possible terms. GeorgeStepanek\talk 20:40, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- To be honest, looking over the Eyre Empire article in its current form, I'm still resolved to keep my vote at delete. I see no references at all - and an awful lot of spurious content (which goes so far as claiming Bill Clinton descended from the Eyres - which I'd happily go along with, if anybody care to provide a reference). Now this presents me with a problem - I don't think the Truelove Eyre article deserves to be on wikipedia, given it's clearly stated Wikipedia is not a genealogy resource, and the opening sentence clearly states "The figure of Truelove (or True Love) appears in geneologies". It's a very hard decision to make, but all I see on the Truelove page at the moment is a family legend, and not a famous one at that. I'm sticking with my original original decision of delete. Nick04 16:17, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Please don't base your decision on the ludicrous Eyre Empire article. Yes, there was a lot of rubbish in this article too, but I have removed that now, and the references show that remaining content is verifiable. Please check the references before you make a final decision. GeorgeStepanek\talk 23:47, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Image:Iris sectorial iridis.jpg has been listed for deletion
[edit]
| An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Iris sectorial iridis.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. |
dbenbenn | talk 19:07, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
Languages
[edit]Hi There! Can you translate my name in what language you know please, and then post it Here. I would be very grateful if you do (if you know another language apart from English and the ones on my userpage please feel free to post it on) P.S. all th translations are in alpahbetical order so when you add one please put it in alpahbetical order according to the language. Thanks!!! Abdullah Geelah 17:14, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Hermes shuttle.jpg)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Hermes shuttle.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Fair use rationale for File:Hermes shuttle.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hermes shuttle.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master 05:32, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)