User talk:Matthew Woodcraft

I put my response on my user page. :] -Stevert

Yes, I saw. I had looked at B P6 and decided there was nothing there, but I didn't think of B Q7 instead. Matthew Woodcraft

In case your interested, heres the sgf with an explanation. Interesting problem, and a crucial point, where sente is vital.

Opps. That'll teach me to write about the RIC while watching a programme on the RUC. I never noticed I'd written the wrong police force! Thanks for correcting it. JTD 23:27 Feb 13, 2003 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for correcting the Source lines of code entry! -- Dwheeler 22:31, 12 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Hi, regarding your vote on http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_logo_vote/Ratification#English_Wikipedia To be valid you need to have a active userpage on Meta which points to your userpage of your home-wikipedia ~~Giskart~~ Walter 21:41, 26 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Tnx re "(yes, break is in beowulf)", i hate to leave loose ends! --Jerzy 10:51, 2004 Feb 9 (UTC)

Thanks, and no, that wasnt the wiki. It was in the wikipedia, I am sure, but the sensei's library will do. --Lacrymology 03:46, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Go

Wikipedia:WikiProject Go now exists. Charles Matthews 13:24, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

King Arthur project collaboration

The King Arthur Project has begun a collaboration to bring its main article, King Arthur, to WP:FA status. If you wish to contribute, please review the to-do list on its talk page. Let's make this article an FA! Wrad 03:26, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cambridge meetup

The second Cambridge meetup is confirmed for this Saturday, 3pm, at CB2 on Norfolk Street: Wikipedia:Meetup/Cambridge 2. Hope to see you there. Charles Matthews (talk) 19:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear Matthew Woodcraft,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 16:48, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]