Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human-readable (0th nomination)
Appearance
Re: Human-readable
- dicdef BeakerK44 04:58, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Delete - there are dicdefs and then there are dicdefs that don't use more nouns and verbs than can be found in the name. - Tεxτurε 22:01, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)Delete:what Texture said ("Hmm, if it's human readable, I wonder what it is? Oh, I see that it means that it's human readable."). Geogre 17:02, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)- Keep. I've expanded this a little but there's a lot more expansion due for this rather stubby coverage of the subject of human-readable and human readability requirements. Jamesday 04:13, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. I think this is an important term in computing and it is being encountered more and more frequently. I have expanded the article yet more and fixed up the existing text. Jeeves 06:51, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Keep revision. Geogre 14:00, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Keep revised article - Tεxτurε 17:09, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)