Talk:Central line (London Underground)

London High‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

East Anglia Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Rapid transit / in UK / in London Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 7, 2016

	London Transport Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject London Transport (assessed as High-importance).

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Central Line.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Requested move 21 February 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved: Clear consensus that the page be moved, with no objections to it. (non-admin closure) Class455fan1 (talk) 17:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

– I'm really surprised that nobody has ever bothered to move this article to an unambiguous title. For as much as I know, "Central line" is just as, if not more, ambiguous as "Circle line"? Moreover, people outside of London will tend to think that "central line" would mean "central venous catheter" at first thought. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 01:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strong support WP:ASTONISH This isn't the London Wikipedia, central lines are prominent in medicine. -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 02:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Query - Are any of the other uses more notable than the London Underground line? Looking at Central line (disambiguation), the only one which pops out as potentially being more notable is the Central venous catheter, and given that is on another page already we could just change the hatnote of this article. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's no such concept as "more notable" in deciding whether there's a primary topic. It would be hard to imagine an argument to make any of the topics primary here. Dicklyon (talk) 01:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support – The present situation doesn't make much sense, and this is especially true if we are going to use lowercase "line" per WP:NCCAPS. The present title implies a generic category, as opposed to the specific London line, and there are "central lines" all over the place, in various fields. There is no reason to make navigation difficult in this way. RGloucester — ☎ 20:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support as someone whose own city has a central line (for now). Sounder Bruce 22:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Clearly there's no primary topic here. However, I would not capitalize Line in the disambig page title. Dicklyon (talk) 01:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support as common sense! Jeni ^(talk) 01:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Partial support. OK for the London addition (Proposer seems to think that any ambiguous term should be 'clarified', but this is not the case here: Central L/line could be a primary topic (by WP:DAB standards). In that case, no DAB term would be needed. However, the London line does not convince as a primary topic, so indeed the DAB term should be added).

wrt the capitalisation of Line/line? As is today, both Central Line and Central line are corvered in the Central line (disambiguation) page, which is OK per WP:DPAGE. With this, I think the DAB content should be in Central line (lowercase, as is today btw). Of course a redirect in the uppercase name page. -DePiep (talk) 08:42, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support. No reason to think this is the primary topic. Egsan Bacon (talk) 13:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. No evidence that this is the primary topic. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:57, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. No clear primary topic. oknazevad (talk) 19:55, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. Class455fan1 (talk) 15:20, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support but make the dab not uppercase 2601:541:4204:7760:B120:7ED4:256:E2D6 (talk) 20:19, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Central line (London Underground). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141029143253/http://www.london24.com/news/transport/tube_s_only_wooden_escalator_to_carry_last_passengers_1_3419976 to http://www.london24.com/news/transport/tube_s_only_wooden_escalator_to_carry_last_passengers_1_3419976

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:04, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Central line (London Underground). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/Performance_Data_Store_P2_2012-13_Issued%281%29.xlsm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140415231448/http://tfl.gov.uk/cdn/static/cms/documents/wtt-67-central-15-september-2013.pdf to https://tfl.gov.uk/cdn/static/cms/documents/wtt-67-central-15-september-2013.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.crossrail.co.uk/80256B090053AF4C/Files/chelsea-hackneyline/%24FILE/chl%2Bsafeguarding%2Bplans%2Bintroduction.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:25, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

History / chronology

Should this not mention the Loughton - Ongar section first as this was built before the "core" central line? Crookesmoor (talk) 17:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Central line (London) redirect?

Would anyone object to the creation of Central line (London) as a redirect to this article? Fork99 (talk) 21:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Murgatroyd49 (talk) 07:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Murgatroyd49: Why what? Just as an FYI, Circle line (London) already redirects to Circle line (London Underground). Fork99 (talk) 08:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it something that is a likely search term? Most people will search for Central Line and come up with the dab page which will send them where they want to go. I would have thought Central Line (tube) or similar would have been a more likely term. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 08:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]