User talk:Cadriel

Ĉi tiu uzanto povas komuniki per meza nivelo de Esperanto.

Ta uzanto povas komunikar per bazala nivelo di Ido.

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Cadriel! I am Drilnoth and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

–Drilnoth (T • C) 17:30, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Greyhawk/D&D contributions, and check out the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject if you haven't already! BOZ (talk) 19:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trotsky

"Trotsky's house in Coyoacán was preserved in much the same condition as it was on the day of the assassination and is now a museum run by a board which includes his grandson Esteban Volkov. The current director of the museum is Dr. Carlos Ramirez Sandoval under whose supervision the museum has improved considerably after years of neglect. Trotsky's grave is located on its grounds."

Photos of the theft

http://bayimg.com/aApLiAABa

http://bayimg.com/AapllAAbA

a photo of the grave from the rear (where the door is)

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_cdssQZkesk...200/trot06.jpg

a photo of the grave from the front

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/32/54...g?v=1129919094

Lenerd (talk) 02:08, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look, seriously, some anarchists claiming they did it and providing low-resolution photographs is not up to WP's standards. This material is getting presented in a highly POV manner, and it needs to be sourced somewhere reputable. If it isn't, it's not encyclopedia content. Cadriel (talk) 09:58, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On Trotsky

You're right about his date of death. I misread the Wikipedia page and confused dates in office with his span of life dates. My error. I apologize, and thanks for the correction. :-) Best regards.Deceglie (talk) 17:30, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SA Page

Thanks for your help so far with the page. You were right that the Brockton section was way too long, and I should have cut it down before i posted it. Sorry if my edits feel like a bombardment, i just want to get the page in good shape since it has looked pretty pathetic for a long time and I dont always have a lot of time to do it. I think I will go back and review wikipedia rules about article editing, and try and be more deliberate about my contributions. I do intend to expand this article further, so be aware of that. I am also working on finding better citations for the things that I post, and try and uphold the citation template. If you have any other concerns of questions let me know, and thanks again for the help! rwmosgrove (talk) 13:26, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think the page is getting better but it's still a bit heavy on stuff from Justice. Brockton was an interesting episode and deserves a paragraph but not extensive quotes, I think I managed to keep all of the relevant external cites when I tried to pare it down a bit. When I have time I'd like to go back over the ideology material, I want to avoid the impression that it's a page that "advertises" Socialist Alternative. The external cites right now are enough that I feel confident it could pass someone trying to call it non-notable, but that "citations needed" banner is something we'll have to get off sooner or later. Cadriel (talk) 17:49, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mark Bergfeld for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Bergfeld is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Bergfeld until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andy (talk) 19:54, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cadriel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]