Talk:58 (number)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 58 (number) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Numbers

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numbers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Numbers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumbersWikipedia:WikiProject NumbersTemplate:WikiProject NumbersNumbers articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mathematics Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Broken link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.ngcic.org/
- In IC 1337 on 2011-04-23 17:08:25, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
- In IC 1337 on 2011-04-24 04:34:10, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
- In 10 (number) on 2011-05-23 02:06:58, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
- In 10 (number) on 2011-05-31 22:27:07, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
- In 11 (number) on 2011-06-01 02:53:15, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
- In 138 (number) on 2011-06-01 14:55:19, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
- In 48 (number) on 2011-06-19 14:01:14, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
- In 52 (number) on 2011-06-19 20:05:38, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:18, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclipse/SEsaros/SEsaros1-175.html
- In 138 (number) on 2011-05-23 02:57:59, 404 Not Found
- In 138 (number) on 2011-06-01 14:55:24, 404 Not Found
- In 159 (number) on 2011-06-01 18:16:47, 404 Not Found
- In 48 (number) on 2011-06-19 14:03:15, 404 Not Found
- In 53 (number) on 2011-06-19 20:09:35, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:19, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 3

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclipse/LEsaros/LEsaros1-175.html
- In 10 (number) on 2011-05-23 02:07:31, 404 Not Found
- In 1520s BC on 2011-05-23 03:34:42, 404 Not Found
- In 1630s BC on 2011-05-25 01:51:51, 404 Not Found
- In 10 (number) on 2011-05-31 22:27:15, 404 Not Found
- In 11 (number) on 2011-06-01 02:53:24, 404 Not Found
- In 1409–1400 BC on 2011-06-01 15:26:12, 404 Not Found
- In 159 (number) on 2011-06-01 18:16:53, 404 Not Found
- In 48 (number) on 2011-06-19 14:03:06, 404 Not Found
- In 53 (number) on 2011-06-19 20:09:29, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:19, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

58 is sum of first seven primes

No it isn't. The first 7 primes are

2 + 3 + 5 + 11 + 13 + 17 + 19 = 70

If you counted 1 as prime, the answer is 52

Can someone fix, I don't know how to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.155.193.120 (talk) 09:52, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing to fix:

2 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 11 + 13 + 17 =58

Dhrm77 (talk) 18:03, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 58 (number). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:48, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bingo names -

Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers#List of British bingo nicknames for a centralized discusion as to whether Bingo names should be included in thiese articles. Arthur Rubin (alternate) (talk) 23:34, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Municipal Okrugs of Saint Petersburg

Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers#Municipal Okrugs of Saint Petersburg for a centralized discusion as to whether Municipal Okrugs of Saint Petersburg should be included in these pages. Certes (talk) 11:57, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Unreferenced" template message missing

Hello, everyone.

I've never interacted personally Wikipedia before, but I've been poking around some number pages lately, and I happened to notice that the claims made in the "In mythology" section are totally unsubstantiated.

The "Unreferenced" template message that I believe is supposed to address this was removed by an anonymous user on 05/05/2013. This user has only one other edit that removes a "citation needed" from the page on 38, also committed on 05/05/2013. I am not knowledgeable enough about editing Wikipedia to resolve this.

My hope is that in posting this to a talk page is that someone more qualified might apply a fix. If not, that's alright, but I think other people who may stumble across these pages deserve to know that the mythology sections are not supported by sources.

Regards,

2600:1700:3B80:32E0:6C11:7067:3DCC:1F39 (talk) 20:35, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"':'" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ':' and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 7#':' until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 18:50, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Manyang

Manyang nakeuh h w 154.198.122.65 (talk) 12:10, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]