This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
The fact is that Megan McTavish's second tenure on AMC was incredibly unpopular, and surprisingly so noting the popularity of her first and third tenures. I don't see how it's a POV-issue. I think that without little notes like these, reminding people of what was going on behind the scenes at the time, only stand to make articles more interesting.
I think it's really an issue of "are internet posters and magazine readers the entirety of fans"? I'm sure there are other fans, who may number a large sum, who don't pay attention to writers, or internet, or magazines, and think "their show" is just fine. Mike H.That's hot08:15, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}