Talk to me!

Archive 1

Duran Duran

Thanks for the confidence in suggesting I review the edits to the Duran Duran entry. It all looks very good. There are a raft of things that could be added, but that I think would be far to much minutia and would on balance give it an over pedantic and obsessive quality. I didn't spot any further real edits to make, though I expanded the passage a bit about Steven Duffy to include references to his subsequent (to Duran) hit "Kiss Me (with your mouth)" which he recorded under the band name Tintin. This might be something you might want to add to your Tintin edits to that article. Anything I can do to fill in the gaps of Duran or 80s music I will gladly do. I want to eventually greatly expand the Gary Numan entry for example. Lestatdelc 21:49, Apr 5, 2004 (UTC)

Piped dates=

Good morning, Catherine. Thanks for the note; I'm afraid I'm guitly of serial infractions of the piped date convention, but will mend my ways and the now piped pages. Best wishes --Tagishsimon 07:56, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Smart phone

Hi Catherine Good morning from Japan. There's a Smartphone entry already, merge? I was thingking of redirecting. I didn't know it was there already.Jondel 01:36, 7 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Smartphone Redirects. Keep up the Good Work. BTW, why not insert your paragraph about the Motorola and MS deal?Jondel

John Taylor (Taylor Ham)

I see (sort of) how your mind works and I like it: research John Taylor and come up with all sorts of wonderful people. I live 60 miles north of Trenton, New Jersey and knew Taylor ham was from there. Now I suppose I'll have to write an article on Taylor ham! (Since Waterfront Park, a baseball stadium, first opened in Trenton, "Trenton Pork Roll by Taylor" (a local variation of Taylor ham) has advertised on the outfield wall. Y'know, I don't think anyone more than 100 miles from Trenton knows what Taylor ham is! (Pardon my ramble.)) CharlieZeb 02:08, 7 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply; I'll have to get on a Taylor ham article. Nothing like Taylor ham, egg and cheese to start a Saturday morning! CharlieZeb 19:46, 7 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
- Taylor Ham article is done (at least for now). Now I could use one of those sandwiches ... CharlieZeb 04:05, 8 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the compliment on Taylor Ham. All I have to do is learn exactly what pork roll is ... CharlieZeb 19:58, 13 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

George Devey

Many thanks for tidying up my George Devey; I can never spot my own mistakes, it reads far better, thanks to your input. Ragussa 14:35, 9 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Crufts page

Hi Catherine. Thanks for the copyediting on the Crufts article - I've removed the extra link added as one of the links already there (crufts.org.uk) redirected to the same page. --DomCleal 12:18, 13 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

West Wycombe Park

Hi Grammatical Expert!

I've just done a page on West Wycombe Park if you have time could you tidy it up, before somebody else gets theit interfering mits on it! I would appreciate itRagussa 20:58, 13 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Catherine

It's all my own work -promise. I found when (before I registered a name) when one wrote an architectural appraisal, and mentioned a famous name, some one would usually jump in and write a biography in middle of the article, which I felt did not sit happily there, hence I was trying to say 'yes I know he did a lot of other things, buts it's nothing to do with this article'.

Far from being biased, I was trying to point out that while people sneer at Waddesdeon for being a mish-mash of styles, West Wycombe is actually no better, but because people tend to approve of classical architecture, we tend to admire West Wycombe and sneer at other types of copies and fakes. I wasn't totally happy with the article anyway, and it does read a lot better now. Thanks - The only thing you've taken out I'd rather left in was the mixture of Ionic and corinthean which was the crux of the point I was too subtly trying to make.

There is absolutely nothing quoted verbatim, dates and names were extracted from: West Wycombe Park; published by Country Life 1967. The National Trust by Peter Ryan published by Dent 1969; Villas and Palaces of Europe; Paul Hamlyn 1966. and finaly the architects bible World Architecture, Hamly revised 1970.

What I think should be done with buildings is write an appraisal trying to explain the whys and reasons for that particular design, but at the same time leave the aristocrats who paid the bills to their own devices and pages elsewhere. By the way I'm dyxlexic, which spell check can usually disguise a bit, but that's why things can come aout a bit disjointed!! Thanks for the work so far Ragussa 07:46, 14 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again

I've just re-read West Wycombe, I think it stands fine as you have left it, perhaps ends a bit abruptly, but definitely not part of the itinerary of a coach outing for the WI! I think I will leave well alone. Hope you don't mind me asking your opponion all the time. I'm not going to do a biography of Francis Dashwood, as I think he was probably quite unpleasant and is best left in his mausoleum!Ragussa 08:29, 14 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Apismellifera

Hi

I got a message about Apismellifera. I understand it'll be directed to honeybee. Yea, I'm doing this as a class project as in putting information. Is it possible if I can keep the webpage for a month after it gets graded? This is my first time and all. Thanks. Arrowhead

Hekhsher

Edits look good to me, thanks for the contribs! Jewbacca 04:05, May 25, 2004 (UTC)

Chequers

Catherine

Could you cast your eye over Chequers I have just given it a major re-write, it was full of mistakes before and (I think unsalvageable). While I am possitive of my facts, could you sort out the grammar before the previous editors take it to pieces and clammer for my blood. Regards Giacomo di Ragussa 17:46, 25 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the work on Chequers. I can speak English fine, but just never spot the errors! Thanks Ragussa 06:20, 26 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did see the question, and have amended it. This is why I need some-one to check. The English is no problem but being dyslexic I can get all my numbers muddled up! and not spot it, spell check does my spellings, but not the maths (alas!) I do appreciate your efforts, I see my Nemesis, Francs 2000 beat you there! I am thinking I have intruded on his patch. I have just done Dorneywood today, I suppose Chevening will have to be next. Then I think I'll even the balance and do a few European

Giacomo Leoni

Hi Catherine

If you have time, could you have a look at Giacomo Leoni for me and check the grammar etc. I have tried to make iy unbiased, but on this one it was quite hard. Giacomo/di Ragussa 12:12, 30 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

George Devey copy

I have just found this on a google search while trying to do some proper work (ie paid!) [1] It seems to contain George Devey and is a complete lift of a page I put (and you helped me with the grammar etc.) on Wikipedia, it has no credits or mention of the project. (I don't want these credits anyway, but the site is full of adverts, so who is making money?} is this an allied project or just rampant plagiarism?

I am thinking you just may be interested - Giano/ di Ragussa User talk:Ragussa 20:16, 30 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. You are right there is now a link in the very small print at the bottom. I think the Wikipedia is such a good idea, I don't like to see it abused, also as you say if there is a mistake on a page it remains stuck there/out of date. Thanking anyhow: Giano

Nice work!

I just stumbled upon the Duran Duran article and found it to be very complete and well-written. In fact I would nominate it for featured article status if the TOC could be condensed a bit and a few more photos were added. Still great work all-around. :) --mav 08:47, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Arts categories

Hi,

I noticed that you have recently created some sub-categories in the visual arts. Can I also encourage you to join the categorisation discussion at Category talk:Art -- Solipsist 21:04, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Sancy

Hi there. I'd just like to thank you for your additions to Sancy (a while ago, I know). Much appreciated. -- Hadal 13:06, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)

My Lai

Thanks for all the work on My Lai! Good stuff.

Wikilove, Quadell (talk) 13:50, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)

Churro

Hi. I just want to say I really liked the churro image you created for the article. Both creative and funny at the same time. And it works, too! Don't know what kind of tool you used for the model, but it's nice. Carry on. – Kaonashi 05:06, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Possibly unfree images

I have listed Image:Cranefly.jpg, Image:Pseudoscorpion.jpg, Image:Schizomid.jpg and Image:Cathmunro.jpg on Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. Guan aco 01:35, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Spider

There is no need to add spiders to the category of arachnid animals as that is the parent category of the spider category. -- Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 02:46, 2004 Oct 8 (UTC)

Hmm

Last night, I thought I had reverted the vandalism to this page... but I must have screwed up, because I'm not in the edit history. Oh, well. :) It makes me wonder if we should perform a Google search for the hg spam thing in the article name spaces. func (talk) 11:53, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)

With regard to the watchlist, the same thing keeps happening to me. I keep clearing my browser's cache, but it doesn't seem to help. Very strange.... P.S. It is extremely wonderful to talk to a mother, artist, programmer, gamer, and custodian who also happens to like Duran Duran and reads Stanislaw Lem. :) func (talk) 17:21, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Gunnery Muse

Catherine of the Wikipedians, I hearby promote you to the rank of Gunnery Muse, with all the privileges and responsibilities it entails. :)

These are your ASCII chevrons: <<<<+++>>

Note: At the moment, the only people you can give orders to are Danakil (he wanted to be Editor Extraordinaire), and to me, (I've choosen to keep myself at Buck Newbie). ;-)

func (talk) 21:32, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)

John Taylor

I am duly stunned by your diligence in creating the John Taylor page, and all the sub-pages thereto! In getting rid of links to the Roger Taylor and John Taylor disambig pages, I found two John Taylors who aren't (AFAICT) in your list:

John Taylor, Labour MP for Chester-le-Street since 1906 - found on this page

John Taylor (born Johannes Gütgemann and later known as John Goodman), and his partner William Gue, incorporated as Taylor, Gue Ltd.; John later sets up his own firm, Veloce Limited - found on this page

After fixing a whole flock of Roger Taylors and John Taylors, I ran out of energy on doing the last few links to John Taylor (all pages about British politicians, I think).

Sigh, I wish we had some good Wikipedia-wide policy on how to name more-specific individual pages - the range of names for the individual John Taylor pages I found was quite considerable.... Noel 00:49, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Template:Sandbox

Helló Catherine! I could see, that Template:Sandbox is protected. There are many InterWiki links from other languages to Wikipedia:Sandbox. Would you please take a look at Template talk:Sandbox#InterWiki's and put the / some InterWiki links in the template? Thanks! Regards Gangleri 20:48, 2004 Oct 23 (UTC)

Thanks! w:fr:Discuter:Antoine de Saint-Exupery Regards Gangleri 22:25, 2004 Oct 23 (UTC)

Helló Catherine! I have seen for some time that the Main Page has no InterWiki's any more. Probably you can find the most InterWiki's at the history of the page. Regards Gangleri 13:07, 2004 Oct 26 (UTC)

5,000 and counting

Congratulations! func (talk) 13:40, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)

My sig

I'm honoured that you are using my sig design, it's in the public domain, so feel free to use (or abuse) it in any way you see fit :)

Cheers, [[User:Solitude|Solitude\^talk]] 08:11, Nov 1, 2004 (UTC)

Photo copyrights

Thanks for the tips on understanding wikipedia photo copyrights policy! Bebop 00:56, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Couple of questions

1. Hi, there, I'm still at it, trying to learn around here how to do things correctly. I noticed that at the British singer's page you've spoken in the history file about a standard format for referring to the other artist by the same name, involving the top of the page. I was just about to do the same in the American author/producer's page when I remembered I'd never seen anything about that in the disambiguation faq page, so I looked there again. And I had seen the Al Green (musician) page referring at the bottom of the page to the other Al Green page, so that's why I'd done it at the bottom. Is there something you've seen that made you think the top is standard? I tend to think that it's not very necessary to emphasize the other person at the top in either of these entries, but only because there's a disambiguation page for those typing just the name into the Search field. Therefore to find either artist, one has to either go first to the disambiguation page and choose or else have typed the name and job description in correctly. I definitely wanted to put the other person in there as a navigational aid. But is it the case that it won't really overly emphasize the other artist by putting it at the top and is more normal looking for an encyclopedia to have it that way? If so, I will change it. I am beginning to think there needs to be a standard format on that issue so that it does look like an encyclopedia. Maybe I should change the two Al Green ones then? I wonder if most of the others are done at the top? I'd have to go to the disambiguation link pages and browse through tons of pages to see. Oh, and I just now more carefully read your bio on your user page, which shows you are an admin and wikipediholic. I hope I don't become a wikipediholic because I'm showing signs of it! --2. Also, do you think that if I make the first words of the author RP article similar to the British RP's first words, and just put the whole name in bold (without repeating it in italic) it won't make someone confused as to how the journalist was known? He was never known as anything but his first and last name without the middle name. In the case of the singer, everyone knows that. I'm just a little worried about the future. Maybe I should delete this clutter I've put here instead of filling up your page, sorry. Or email you when it's long like this? Bebop 02:22, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC) P.S. I finally made the RP format updates just now but did have the above questions before I made them. Bebop 02:36, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I just encountered another situation where the reference to another person by the same name was at the bottom of the article: Sam Phillips. I have moved it to the top, but after finding that and the Al Green one being at the bottom, I'm confused about what the standard is.Bebop 20:34, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Untagged images

Hi! I'm Quadell, pleased to meet you. Thanks so much for working on those untagged images. (I was starting to think I was the only one doing it.) You tagged 88! Nice.

When I run into an image without source info, I use the templates here. Some taggers get aggressive with uploaders who didn't tag their images, but I've found it works much better to thank them for uploading and ask nicely. I also run into some of the coolest images by going through the tag lists, including several I submitted as Featured Image Candidates.

Keep up the good work. – Quadell ^{(talk) (help)}[[]] 04:49, Nov 20, 2004 (UTC)

Hi again. If an image is an exact duplicate of another image, or if an image is just a scaled down version of another image, it's safe to speedily-delete it. But if it's a different format (a PNG instead of a JPG, for instance), you're supposed to list it on IfD instead. I've also been deleting those image-description pages that don't have images. I'm not sure if there's a policy or not, but I can't see any harm.

Note, though, that the "What Links Here" piece of the image-description page is not reliable. Before you delete an image, you're supposed to look it up manually, by searching on the image name in quotes.

Thanks for all your great word on Wikipedia! – Quadell ^{(talk) (help)}[[]] 01:07, Nov 21, 2004 (UTC)

whooooooops

Good Evening, Catherine: i just added a bunch of album covers [actually EP covers] but did not use the {{albumcover]] designation, which I just discovered. Shoud i go back and somehow redo them? If so, how do i do that? Feel free to use, say, Manfred Mann as an example. Carptrash 07:17, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)

well i just scanned [in four pieces] the My Generation cover, but could not decide where to introduce the {{My Generation]] link. Any thoughts? Carptrash 08:15, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I am what used to called in my school years, "a slow learner" but it doen't mean it can't be done. Thanks for your patience and insiights. I'll pull out my album cover entries [which are all low resolutions scans done at home] and correct the copyright tags. Most of my other imges are ones that i've taken, and for the few that are from elsewhere I've actually tracked down the copyright holders and received permission - a rather slow process, I might add, but very satisfying.

Size Counts

I had scanned and put together the My Generation cover at life size. I can i think, reduce it to a half or even quarter size pretty easily. Carptrash 21:14, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)

pseudoscorpion image

I noticed you put the email address of the person giving permission by email for the pseudoscorpion image. I have permission by email to upload a photo on a musician entry. It mentioned putting his name, although I guess it wouldn't say "Copyright" and his name because that would confuse the "copyleft" aspect. So I'd put "Photo" and his name since he took it of himself, as he is a musician and photographer. My question is do I have to show his email address? I can't be publishing his email address on the web publicly like that. I've also got to go read what the image size requirements are so I can size the photo appropriately before uploading. Then I have to figure out how to make it look right on a page. Bebop 06:44, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Ok, I was looking at more of your images. One of them is a spider image with "copyright" retained, but free use allowed so long as it gives credit to the photographer. Then you have another that is of a different subject with a "Creative Commons" license and that guy wanted to be credited. How did you come up with the Creative Commons license one? Did the photographer mention it? Although the photographer i am dealing with would license it GFDL, i think he'd rather be mentioned as photographer. If he did it and retained copyright as with the spider photo, would the free use aspect of that be any different (or less protective of his rights) than if he did it via GDFL? Does GDFL not allow for him to at least have his name credited to use it unless we call the license something other than GFDL? This is what is hanging me up. Bebop 08:13, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

On the special upload page, what are you supposed to put in the Summary box below the file name box when uploading?Bebop 08:19, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for answering in my page. I have a couple of more questions posted there. Bebop 22:17, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

And thanks, yet again, for more answers last night at the helpdesk. The admins have the patience of saints! Bebop 14:34, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)

RC Flags

Thanks for your comment on vp proposals. It was nice to see a lengthy and considered critique of the idea. CXI 15:10, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Thursday October Christian

Thank you for your kind comments: it is always nice to get this kind of encouragement. I always Google subjects prior to making VfD votes, and I thought that this individual, although not a major player on history's stage, was at least quirky and interesting. The challenge then was to convey this to readers of the article. I'm glad you enjoyed reading it. (By the way, I hope you don't mind my imitating your clever sig format.) [[User:GeorgeStepanek|George\^talk ]] 23:19, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

No prob -- 'twas truly an interesting read! I can't stomach hanging out on VFD for long, but I do try to drop my two cents in there at least once a week -- there's always something I disagree with deleting! Anyway, I ran across Thursday because of his listing on the WP:FAC page, because a page I have been working on was recently listed there, much to my surprise.

My cunning plan to get more "keep" votes worked, then! 8-) The FAC listing was long shot, but it was worth a try.

If you have a moment, could you check out Duran Duran and let me know how it could be improved?

Sorry, but this subject is totally outside of my area of expertise (and interest). The layout, writing, spelling and grammar looks good anyway...

Nice to see someone else who likes Body for Life -- haven't managed to stick with the program for very long at a time, but it's made an impact on the way I buy and eat food, at least.

I couldn't do it either. I did a much milder version over the course of a year (2003), and lost about 20 kg. I actually think the program is just too tough for people who have a job, kids etc. -- but the basic principles are sound. [[User:GeorgeStepanek|George\^talk ]] 00:59, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)

South Wraxall Manor

Hi Catherine, I had a look through about 20 books on English domestic architecture - nothing. There is this site [2] which you have probably already found yourself. Incidentally Sherborne Castle makes the same claim about Walter Raleigh, exept there he had a bucket of water thrown over him, as they thought he was on fire!

Sorry to have been so long in replying, but I changed my user name from Ragussa ages ago, and thought I had left a redirect, obviously not Giano 22:17, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)

"South Wraxall Manor OS.173 (ST834655)

Between BRADFORD-ON-AVON and BOX on a minor road.

The basic house was built in the 15c around a hall c.1435 which still has its roof and screen. There is a good porch and doorway and transom windows which all add to its character. A very fine feature is the gatehouse c.1510 with an oriel window.

Robert Long built the house and his descendant Walter Long added a large drawing room with many windows in the 16c. This is another beautiful and noble house along with its associated buildings which cover three sides of a courtyard.

It was here, as legend has it, that Sir Walter Long and Sir Walter Raleigh were the first to smoke tobacco in England and where servants threw water over Raleigh believing him to be on fire."

Custom signature

Hi Catherine, I was just wondering how you do this Catherine\^talk] with your signature - is it a personalised template? Paul Tracy

Hiya Paul! I learned my sig trick from User:Solitude -- Just paste this:

      [[User:Paul Tracy|Paul Tracy]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Paul Tracy|talk]]</sup>

into the "Your nickname (for signatures):" field on Special:Preferences, and click the checkbox for "Raw signatures (without automatic link)". Cheers! Catherine\^talk 01:31, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Thanks - that was easier than I thought - I had seen the nickname box but didn't realise it accepted markup! Paul Tracy_/talk 09:43, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Heya, since you posted the format of your signature, I've kinda helped myself to it, so "Thanks" for that and hope you don't mind! Kyrin\^talk 21:25, 2004 Dec 15 (UTC)

Image:Movement.png

hi, i adapted the image from a source, so the info is from another source, however, i am wondering about it's usefulness, because it does not mention most of the info in the actual article.

Okay, I can do it myself now, I finally figured out how to add the "license tag" thing. I'll try to update the license stuff on the other stuff I uploaded, thanks for bringing it up --Tlarson

Image tagging

Hi Catherine! Thanks so much for taking over my part of the image tagging effort. My time's now occupied with Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I doubt I'll be returning to the image tagging project any time soon. Thanks again! --David Iberri | Talk 06:49, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC)

please check the wikipage of "America's Army" and the discussion page (the bottom of it). There seems to be a copyright problem and more...

The Humungous Image Tagging Project

Hi. You've helped with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Wikipedia fixing project, User:Yann/Untagged Images, which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for at at and the the, non? You know you'll love it. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk)

RFC pages on VfD

Should RFC pages be placed on VfD to be deleted? I'm considering removing Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Slrubenstein, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jwrosenzweig and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/John Kenney from WP:VFD. Each of them was listed by CheeseDreams. Your comments on whether I should do this would be appreciated. - Ta bu shi da yu 03:26, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for JPG help

Hello Catherine and thank you for your fast response to my plea for help.

The colon after "[[" is exactly what I was looking for.
My confusion about reloading an image may be the result of the way my browser (Safari) works. I had reloaded Image:Hydnjo.JPG several times (take a peek at that page's history) but the initial BIG image kept showing up no matter which revision I called up. I tried logging out and into WP and emptying Safari's cache but to no avail. But,when I went back there after reading your response this morning the image was thumbnail size (how did you do that)! So today (as an experiment) I replaced that image with it's horizontal reverse (Heidi-left, Joe-right). Same thing happened (twice); the old image kept showing up. In desperation I restarted my computer and then all was fine. Question - does WP have a time delay when images are replaced or is my iMac browser ignoring my request to empty it's cache?
Thanks for the "Picture tutorial" link - more stuff to learn.
Your User and Talk pages will keep me up way past my bedtime tonight.
Is your self-reference (I had to look it up in WP) an MBTI category?
Without asking your permission, I ripped off your signature format. Thanks again,[[User:Hydnjo| Hydnjo\^talk]] 23:25, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Hello again Catherine

Thanks for the server tutorial. I suspected as much after a few more experiments; I seemed to have no control over the timing of the new upload actually showing up. I was confused at first because of a few coincidental occurrences. Your explanation fits my experiences.

I noted your acknowledgement to Solitude after sending my comments. Thanks anyway.

Also, there are about three times more of you INFPs out there than you think according to an excellent reference resource. [[User:Hydnjo| Hydnjo\^talk]] 00:18, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Oops, I forgot this.

Special Thanks To ... (from Hydnjo)

Flockmeal for your kind welcome. [[User:Hydnjo| Hydnjo\^talk]] 04:06, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

→Raul654 for your help with templates. [[User:Hydnjo| Hydnjo\^talk]] 04:06, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

David Iberri for your help in finding THE template list. [[User:Hydnjo| Hydnjo\^talk]] 04:06, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Catherine for your help with uploading images and making my signature look like I know what I'm doing. [[User:Hydnjo| Hydnjo\^talk]] 04:06, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

and →Raul|654 (again) for watchlisting HIS talk page and taking the time to respond. [[User:Hydnjo| Hydnjo\^talk]] 04:06, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I'd like to post the string that generates my sig on my User Page

I would like to post the string that generates my sig on my User Page as you have done on yours, but none of the things I've tried (ie nowiki) keeps the string from being interpreted by the wiki software as some kind of a command string... :( sigh ): Any suggestions?

– Dennis _{(talk) (Wiki NYC Meetup)}[[]]

Duran Duran

Glad to see I helped sucker another one in... The section in Duran Duran looks pretty good. I may fiddle with it a bit tonight, though -- it would be good, if possible, to link to a source where all those people cited Duran Duran as an influence. Tuf-Kat 19:01, Dec 19, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks For the Message!

No shit, it's called vandalism. You only know 'cause you (or whoever) obsessively browse the Duran Duran article.

Wondering about Name Checker

I checked my name here at http://kohl.wikimedia.org/kates-tools/namecheck.action --

The username Bebop is used on these wikis (wikis with the same number have the same email set, [*] = no email):

[*] enwikibooks
[1] enwiki
[2] frwiki

Does this mean there are other wikipedias besides this one that have other people using the name Bebop? Should I choose a different name? Bebop 22:08, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)

"Sneaky bias" template

Thank you for coming to my rescue on the Village pump page. I'm coming to the realization that some people on Wikipedia prefer to write first and read later. (I mean, I've never done that. :-) I guess it'll be an uphill climb, but I do think that it might be beneficial to showcase the History page more.

Anyway, thanks again! --dablaze 05:51, Jan 15, 2005 (UTC)

Starcraft

Duran! Duran! yes, that's my name! what is so funny about it!

point taken. But when the revolution comes, The Marketing department of the Serius Cybernetics Corportation *will* be first up the wall :D

Project2501a 20:14, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Hello

Thanks, what a nice message. I've been busy with other projects, but I do still think of the 'pedia fairly often. It's a nice place, and I wouldn't mind contributing again--there are still areas where I could help--but I really should make diplomacy a habit first. ^_^ Best wishes-- Koyaanis Qatsi 21:56, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Heya!

Well you deserved them! I noticed you did some Blade Runner work, and I'm like... sheesh, a graphics / programming demi-goddess and she be into Blade Runner too! Why haven't I found Wikipedia till now, life isn't fair! (*Shakes fist at a Pepsi can*) :'D

Thanks for the encouragement, I may need it to work out the best way to organize the Blade Runner article (which is being expanded as I hit these keys) and figure out how I can get the NPOV notice removed from my Abortion article with everyone (MamaGeek and Marcie and Tony and RoyBoy) being satisfied... I can understand why Tony put it there, but it undercuts the articles credibility without specifying exactly what is disputed to readers. Aw well, ces't la vie... I learned I while back there's no use rushing things.

And if your wikistress gets too high, uh, do yoga? Cya 'round!") - RoyBoy [∞] 05:42, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

FA by email

A while back, you asked a question on the featured article by email page about how many subscribers the list has. Sorry, but I didn't get the message until recently. The list has (as I write this) 1,591 subscribers. In the future, if you have any featured article questions, the best place to ask would be just to ask me directly on my talk page. →Raul654 15:10, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)

The great www.wikipedia.org vote

Andre has written: "A combination would be rather nice - I like Forseti's header, background, puzzle pieces, and dividing lines, but I like Catherine's central globe." That sounds like an excellent idea indeed to me. Is it too late to think about merging the two proposals at this stage in the voting process? GeorgeStepanek\^talk 04:44, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)