User talk:Nkocharh

Image copyright problem with Image:Richard_bacon_despatch.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Richard_bacon_despatch.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 13:15, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Tuku.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tuku.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:16, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trial of the Twenty-One

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Trial of the Twenty-One, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.yawiki.org/proc/servlet/RSS?page=Trial%20of%20the%20Twenty%20One. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 10:18, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plasmawr

Hi, do you actually go to Ysgol Gymraeg Plasmawr? Because the school's pupils are not all mostly disicples of Islam. Cf38 (talk) 15:17, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, I do not. I was simply doing some disambiguation link repair on the subject of rowing. -Nkocharh (talk) 00:32, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:ElectoralCollege1996.svg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:ElectoralCollege1996.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Zginder^{(talk) (Contrib)} 01:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx

Thanx for pointing out the signature issue. I did that when signature was not on by default, circa 2006 ;)
An update, I saw that u cleaned up the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Graphic_Lab/Images_to_improve & made it very nice/easy for people to state. How did u do that? If you could guide me to the process, would know what to do as & when I want to add something to the basket of icons already done. --Shirishag75 (talk) 14:03, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you're welcome, glad you got the sig figured out.

As for your other question, I wasn't the one who moved things around. But are you talking about the <gallery> tag? We use that a lot at the Graphic Lab to collect a bunch of images. Click "edit" on one of the tasks that has a group of images and you'll see how it works.— ʞɔıu 07:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, would have to try that sometime --Shirishag75 (talk) 12:37, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Open-sourcing the Fed graph

Response on my talk page. --Kbh3^rd talk 21:15, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the rest of the electoral college maps

you've done great work on the 2004, 2000, 1996, and 1992 electoral maps. However, I notice that the maps from 1836 to 1976 have the inverse color scheme we have come to know and society has eventually standardized, with red=Democrat and blue=Republican. I believe that having maps with that scheme is extremely confusing and also has the effect of making historical studies and comparisons difficult. I notice the modern color scheme is used on the 1980-1988 maps, but they have the old style png.s. Would it be possible you could update all the maps from 1836-1988 to not only the svg format, but also the standard color scheme red=Republican, blue=Democrat? I know the old scheme was once used, but having it on maps looked at today is obselete, and anachronism, and confusing. thank youTallicfan20 (talk) 04:55, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hey, I'm wondering if you could possibly make those electoral maps in the style of 1992-2004 with the svg. I have no idea how to do them.Tallicfan20 (talk) 08:16, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Confederate States map, could you tweak it?

Hi, I was wondering if you could rework your CSA map a bit. It's a little inaccurate, the states in dark green are shown as "formally" seceding from the US, and actually about 2/3's of West Virginia formally seceded from the US. If you look at the map I made (not very good, I'm afraid) on the History of West Virginia page, the green & white map in the "Civil War" section, you will see what I mean. Perhaps a third color would work. If it's too much trouble, don't bother about it. Thanks. Dubyavee (talk) 06:04, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ShapourBakhtiar.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ShapourBakhtiar.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question about choice of colors

Are you the person who originally made the Electoral College maps like this one? If so, I'm just curious about how you decided on the particular shades of red and blue that you used. Was there a discussion about it somewhere? Were you inspired by something? Did you just like the way it looked? Äþelwulf Talk to me. 10:51, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am the person who made the first couple of those EC maps. IIRC those colors are slight variations on the colors from another map, which I cannot now find. The reason I chose the pastels over the primary colors was that the places where the two met just looked so much better. You can see it, I think, in the primary color maps that remain: the red and blue really just do not gel at the edges. There was never a discussion; I decided to be bold, and one person questioned it, but no community discussion ever came of it that I saw. I lost interest after making several maps and then it looks like someone else took over. — ʞɔıu 08:56, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chunnel traffic: Request for an update

If I followed the right link, you are the creator of the Channel Tunnel traffic figures diagram. This is a notification for my update request at the file's Talk page. --Rontombontom (talk) 19:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, that's me! Thanks for the update, I'll create a new graph. — ʞɔıu 23:24, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done!— ʞɔıu 06:53, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I updated the Summary and the actal traffic data table.--Rontombontom (talk) 10:36, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lost negation in article on thread safety

I'm a little confused about this change to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_safety: 20:22, 26 January 2008 Nkocharh (talk | contribs) (5,708 bytes) (→Implementation: grammar, punctuation fixes) (undo)

You remove the "not" from this sentence: These variables retain their values across subroutine and other code boundaries, and are thread-safe since they are local to each thread, even though the code which accesses them might not be reentrant.

I'd like to restore that "not", because even in functions which are NOT reentrant, the code remains thread safe if thread local variables are used. Reentrant functions are by the definition already thread safe.

I'm not a native English speaker so maybe I'm just reading it wrong, but then maybe the sentence needs to be rewritten so it's clearer what's really meant.

85.112.166.110 (talk) 09:14, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 82,

First off, sorry for the delay! I was on vacation for a month and wasn't checking Wikipedia.

You are correct, that change is technically accurate, but obscures the point that clause is trying to make. I was 80% through a rebuttal before I figured out what the sentence was meant to say, though. :-) So I think your suggestion of rewriting the sentence is a good one. How about:

"Variables are localized so that each thread has its own private copy. These variables retain their values across subroutine and other code boundaries and are thread-safe since they are local to each thread. Because of this, code which accesses only local and thread-local variables can safely be non-reentrant." — ʞɔıu 08:52, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Greenland (1988 play)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Greenland (1988 play), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No references or evidence of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. magnius (talk) 09:29, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chunnel_traffic.svg

Hello,

I’ve uploaded a French version of the graph File:Chunnel_traffic.svg you’ve made some time ago, and slightly adapted your file, due to a minor purple/cyan issue (Firefox complied to the SVG code: purple line with cyan crosses, but Wikimedia interpreted it in a nicer way: both the line and the crosses are drawn in purple). This avoid visitors to see different result according to the way they look at the SVG file (and maybe Wikimedia will fix its SVG-to-PNG module some day). I assumed you won’t mind this change (feel free to revert it otherwise).

Note that given I don’t have the software you’ve used to create the SVG, and to avoid messing it up, I haven’t updated the graph with 2009 data. Feel free to edit the French version File:Chunnel_traffic-fr.svg in case you wish to update both your English version & my French translated version.

— MetalGearLiquid ^[chat] 02:29, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note : in case you wish posting a message on my French wiki discussion page, feel free to use either English or French.

I have added the 2009 data to the tables on the graph's commons page. Seeing that you (Nkocharh) weren't active on Wikipedia for some time but hoping that you are still lurking, I ask: could you update the graph now? --Rontombontom (talk) 08:41, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the end I downloaded Gnuplot and ran your script to create the updated version myself. If you have some problem with that, you are of course free to revert it. --Rontombontom (talk) 10:04, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I hadn't logged in for over a month. Thanks for taking the initiative and DLing gnuplot! — ʞɔıu 08:32, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong licensing

Hi, please remember that you cannot release a derivative image of a file licensed under a Creative Commons license into the public domain. I fixed the license and added attribution, which is required. Please be careful with possible copyright violation (especially of maps, you have made many of those), thanks. Hekerui (talk) 18:01, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And please remember, when someone modifies a public domain image and puts it under a cc-by-sa license, that license has to be used for a new derivative work of that image because of the share-alike portion of the license. Hekerui (talk) 18:21, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out and for fixing it! Oversight on my part. — ʞɔıu 14:09, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot I wanted to thank you for creating this map. So, thank you. Regards Hekerui (talk) 21:16, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Laurel forest

Just wanted to let you know that I was delighted to see the tag you added to this page. It is not for an faint-of-heart editor! Unfortunately, the "You can assist by editing it." message from the tag is far to likely to inspire the wrong person (who is also active on Lauraceae, in case you feel inspired to tackle that one). Nadiatalent (talk) 12:32, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the pat on the back. I stumbled across that page and could barely make heads or tails of it! I started a rewrite of just a sentence or two, but got so turned around I gave up after 10 minutes. Perhaps I'll have another go. The person who added all that stuff really seems energetic, and yeah: that's the problem. :-) — ʞɔıu 15:17, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Beatles Invite

Hi! I've seen you around on The Beatles' articles... Would you consider becoming a member of WikiProject The Beatles, a WikiProject which aims to expand and improve coverage of The Beatles on Wikipedia? Please feel free to join us.

Abbey Road... You're not in this picture... yet!

Todo list:

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Iver003 (talk) 13:08, 12 December 2015 (UTC)) How did you do the US Electoral Map?[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nkocharh. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nkocharh. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image problem with Image:ElectoralCollege2000.svg

I noticed that you are the uploader of the File:ElectoralCollege2000.svg image. I noticed that someone has made some recent updates that include inaccurate data. It lists Utah as having 6 electoral votes and in the 2000 election they still had 5 per your original upload. Not sure if your watching the updates so I thought I'd raise it. Ryskis (talk) 21:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing this out, I'll have a look and update it as needed. — ʞɔıu 14:42, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nkocharh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nkocharh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]