User talk:Kalimac
Welcome!
Additional tips:
- Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:
- If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
- If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
- Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
- You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
- You might want to add yourself to the New User Log
- If your first language isn't English, try Wikipedia:Contributing to articles outside your native language
Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 19:48, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Steeleye Span
[edit]Please see my question at Talk:Folk-rock#Steeleye_Span. -- Jmabel | Talk June 29, 2005 02:12 (UTC)
- Follow-up question, same place. - Jmabel | Talk 04:10, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
Sorry but since you seem to be the user who wrote this could you please tell me where you got this and who the commentators are? And Again I'm sorry but could you answer me as fast as possible, I need the info very soon. from the "Angry Young Men" article: "Some commentators, following publisher Tom Maschler, who edited a collection of political-literary essays by the "Angries" (Declaration, 1957), divided them into three groups:
The New University Wits (a term applied by William Van O'Connor in his 1963 study The New University Wits and the End of Modernism), Oxbridge malcontents who explored the contrast between their upper-class university privilege and their middle-class upbringings. They included Kingsley Amis, Philip Larkin, and John Wain, all of whom were also part of the poetic circle known as The Movement. Writers mostly of lower-class origin concerned with their political and economic aspirations. Some of these were left-wing and some were right-wing. They included John Osborne (whose play Look Back in Anger is a basic "Angries" text), Harold Pinter, John Braine, and Alan Sillitoe. William Cooper, the early model AYM, though Cambridge-educated was a "provincial" writer in his frankness and material and is included in this group. A small group of young existentialist philosophers led by Colin Wilson and also including Stuart Holroyd and Bill Hopkins. " Answer me on my user page Roman Taycher --rtaycher1987 10:18, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Norton Lectures
[edit]Hello, I wanted to thank you for the overhaul on the Norton Lectures page. I spent quite a bit of time bringing it to where it was, and I believe it took you a while as well. Congrats on finding all that information. I thought it was very inaccessible... Happy surfing/editing, Rareş
PS: Are you also affiliated with Harvard? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Raresel (talk • contribs) 00:52, 25 April 2007 (UTC).
This is excellent information to have in the article. What's your source? - Stepheng3 (talk) 19:04, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Peggy Stuart Coolidge
[edit]Hi. My sources say she was "the first female US composer to have an LP devoted to her works". Do you know of an earlier one? Appreciate you not making such edits without a source. Cheers. -- JackofOz (talk) 12:30, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Try checking the discussion page for the topic before you jump in and undo a correction. The discussion page, rather than a source note on the entry itself, is the proper location for such a note. Kalimac (talk) 12:39, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. I should have checked there first. However, there's still a little problem. The sources in the article proper say she was the first. We now know that's not quite true. In order to source the statement that she was merely "one of the first", wouldn't it be appropriate to have a reference for that in the article, and not just on the talk page? Cheers. -- JackofOz (talk) 12:43, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
- Do as you like, if you think this important. Maybe "Source X says she was the first, but etc etc etc" Kalimac (talk) 12:46, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Kalimac. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Kalimac. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Kalimac. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)