Talk:Dutch elm disease

Comments

who discovered dutch elm disease? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.156.132.163 (talk • contribs) 19:46, December 16, 2004 (UTC)

the dutch? ;) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dpaajones (talk • contribs) 18:30, November 11, 2005 (UTC)

the elm —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.100.250.218 (talk • contribs) 12:36, 3 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Resistant trees

The Red Elm is not mentioned as being among the 'resistant trees,' and therefore no explanation is given, either, as to why it hasn't played a greater role in the resistance programme. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.100.250.218 (talk • contribs) 12:33, 3 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Role of climate change and woodpecker decline

It seems likely that either or both of global warming and decline in woodpeckers, which predate on beetle larvae, itself resulting from reductions in the area of mature broadleaved woodland, losses of non-woodland trees including elms, increases in woodland isolation and reductions in the occurrence of dead wood (Vanhinsbergh et al. 2001) are candidate causes for the spread of the disease (http://www.bto.org/birdtrends2001/wcrleswo.htm), but we will need a reference for the first. See also http://www.nps.gov/shen/naturescience/downy-woodpecker.htm

what does it look like? {dutch elm disease}71.105.147.212 22:38, 24 July 2007 (UTC)leeanne[reply]

Populations of Downy and one other Woodpecker species native to North America have substantially shown recovery since the introduction of a new exponentially building larval food source, Emerald Ash Borer. Woodpeckers extreme behavior during todays Extant & Extinction of Fraxinus has now been well documented after causing unprecedented "Flecking" of whole trunks and limbs when foraging for EAB larva over winter. Never before have Woodpeckers been observed causing this much extensive damage to bark, when searching out native phloem borer larvae over past human history.CHICAGOCONCERTMAN (talk) 02:50, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eradicating the beetle

The article makes no mention of any efforts to eradicate or control the beetle itself, thus preventing, or limiting, the spread of the fungus. If any serious work by entomologists had been done on this, one would assume it would have been mentioned in the article. As this line of reasoning will surely occur to most readers of the article, would it not be a good idea for the botanists to explain why it is not worth while attempting? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.136.50.8 (talk) 05:12, August 20, 2007 (UTC)

B-Class???

I don't know why Wikipedia rated this as a B-class article it seems more like a C-class to me, this is why:

It does not follow a consistent structure, with info scattered around,

In my opinion it should have more info about the cause of the disease and less info about where it has originated... so on

I don't think its a bad article so much, just that it could be a lot better, I will try and fix it up with some of your consent.Mike of Wikiworld (talk) 08:30, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spread of disease

Even though this is an English languaged encyclopedia, it does seem a bit strange that the "Europe" section only mentions the disease in the UK, followed by sections labeled "United States" and "Canada". I presume this disease also existed outside of English speaking countries? --Saddhiyama (talk) 23:18, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anti- Dutch Trig

There is this uncited statement in the Preventative Treatment - Biological section: "Trials in the US most notably Denver Colorado showed that Dutch Trig had a dramatic effect Elms and that the treated trees were made sick by the treatment." I believe the source for this statement may be this forum user's posts here where the poster also appears to be confused about how the preventative treatment is supposed to work: of course the trees are uninfected. Also this statement, flat out contradicted by the trial results. Reading onwards, this individual also has a relationship with a competitor to Dutch Trig. Okay. Anyway, all the more reliable sources I can find state that the Denver, CO, trials were highly successful, so I'm deleting this unsupported statement and replacing it with cited info.118.209.46.88 (talk) 05:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dutch elm disease. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.lewes.gov.uk/environment/5954.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:07, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Dutch elm disease. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:50, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Dutch elm disease. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:32, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish version photos

The Spanish GA version is much shorter than what we have, but it does appear to have some superior photos. If anyone wants to rework this page, I'd suggest borrowing some from there. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 05:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]