Jump to content

Talk:World's Biggest Gang Bang

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

For a September 2004 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/The World's Biggest Gang Bang


I don't think this is a speedy delete. Maybe it should go, maybe it shouldn't. But it's definitly not the clear cut case that speedy delete's need to be. --Starx 00:54, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)


In the trivia section I deleted an info that was previously written... the fact that the male actors were not 300.

incorrect info

[edit]

"although all the men were tested and most of the time condoms were used" is incorrect. It is stated in the documentary ("Sex: The Annabel Chong Story") that "some" had test.

Fair use rationale for Image:Worlds biggest gangbang2.jpg

[edit]

Image:Worlds biggest gangbang2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 09:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]