Talk:Plasma stealth

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Plasma stealth received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

I am the author and copyright holder of the page referenced below.

http://www.aeronautics.ru/archive/plasma/

That's nice. And who are you, and why should we be interested in that? Dan100 16:05, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)

He just posted that here because I originally listed the article as a copyvio before he confirmed that he had written it himself. silsor 18:28, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)

It seems like the "glow discharge" section is largely a discussion of electrohydrodynamic thrust, and is not relevant to this article, except perhaps in passing, in the introduction, as another application of plasma technology to aircraft. Maybe someone can start a new page, or merge it into another existing article? --Dashpool 20:29, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm always reading this page before but where is that article wich pertains a Su 27 using a plasma stealth generator, why was it removed?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.14.194.33 (talk) 03:31, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

B-2 Bomber == Am I the only one who sees a link between this article and the B-2 bomber? Janes Defense weekly revealed a long time ago that the leading and trailing edges of the aircraft are charged to a high electrical potential difference. This is highly likely to be the combined system of electrostatic propulsion and "plasma stealth". Anyone else have any input? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leeveraction (talk • contribs) 23:35, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources please. Not just random speculation. Rmhermen (talk) 00:22, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen this before, just need to locate the reference in Janes. Makes a lot of sense and it is NOT "anti grav" propulsion. Leeveraction (talk) 17:53, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The high voltage applied between the leading edge and trailing edge of the flying wing may be part of the system to add electrical charges to the surface airflow layers, which forms a weak plasma layer, help reduce turbulence and may assist the "Smoothing" of the surface morphology, just as a pilot cockpit glass coated with conducting transparent metal thin film "cloak" the inside of the cockpit and reduce strong reflections from that area. But the real "Plasma Stealth" of B-2 seems to be the dielectric barrier discharge devices installed before the engine intake and after the engine exhaust. If you ever come across a photo of a B-2 bomber during in-air refueling, you can see strong plasma generated in these dielectric barrier discharge areas. The turbine blade has been one of the major sources of strong radar reflections in an airplane (the other is the slotted antenna of Doppler airborne radar). Some fighter design like F-22 uses curved intake duct coated with radar absorption material to reduce reflection from engine blades, but in the case of B-2, such design is not suitable because there is not enough length in its flying wing design, therefore the "Plasma Stealth" design may have been applied. By putting the Plasma Stealth on top of the flying wing, the glow generated by the plasma is invisible to ground observers or FLIR on other fighters, but it is visible to DSP satellites, which US currently dominates, so the glow does not matter. The Plasma Stealth on Su-27 or later models seems to apply a different plasma generating principle. If you have chance to see the picture of a late Su series fighters, in front of the engine intake on the side of the fuselage, there is a small "window" of different material. This window could be a microwave window, just as the microwave window in your microwave oven. A strong magnetron placed inside the window could generate plasma in front of the engine, and this plasma will flow into the engine, which will reduce the reflections from the engine blade, and may also help combustion because plasma is a high temperature substance.

Can we trim this down?

Unless there's some objection, I'll just trim out all the uncited sections. That should get it down to a paragraph. Hcobb (talk) 01:14, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Plasma stealth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060910192951/http://rclsgi.eng.ohio-state.edu/~adamovic/netl/PowerBudgtHighPlasma.pdf to http://rclsgi.eng.ohio-state.edu/~adamovic/netl/PowerBudgtHighPlasma.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:41, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

== This, is complete nonsense.