User talk:Sesmith

{{Relevance-inline}} Carlos A. Cifuentes [1]

Estimated Sesmith :

Together with hello , I would like to request your help regarding an article I am developing in Wikipedia Carlos A. Cifuentes ( In Spanish ) . Well, I was informed that you were the only person who can help me with this article , as you know well concerning the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day , and all that the leaders of this Church (South America) .

Yesterday , I found a no-nonsense {{Relevance-inline}} in the article, and Wikipedista suggested that I make contact with you ASAP . The no-nonsense {{Relevance-inlinet}} was placed by User:Saloca , who in response to my questioning he replied that he was not a man of religion , and therefore could not help me.

I would like to ask you I could contribute to this Article Carlos A. Cifuentes, because I think you are the only person who can help. I am also aware that you write and speak in English , but very respectfully await your contribution.

En español

Estimado Sesmith:

Junto con saludarle, quisiera solicitar su ayuda referente a un artículo que estoy desarrollando en Wikipedia Carlos A. Cifuentes (En español). Bueno, me informaron que usted es la única persona que me puede ayudar con este artículo, pues usted conoce bien lo referente a la Iglesia de Jesucristo de los Santos de los Últimos Días, y todo cuanto a los Líderes de esta Iglesia en (Sudamérica).

El día de ayer, me encontré con un {{sin relevancia}} en el artículo, y un Wikipedista me sugirió que hiciera contacto con usted lo antes posible. El {{sin relevancia}} fue colocado por el Usuario:Saloca, quien en respuesta a mi interpelación me respondió que él no era hombre de Religión, y por eso no podía ayudarme.

Quisiera solicitarle a usted pudiera contribuir con este Articulo Carlos A. Cifuentes, pues creo usted es la única persona que puede ayudar. También soy consciente que usted escribe y habla en Ingles, pero con mucho respeto espero su contribución.

I send you a big, warm greetings from Chile, and I am at your service. Etcengineer (talk) 18:37, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category nomination

I've nominated Category:The Church of Jesus Christ, a category you created, for renaming. See the discussion HERE. Rich Uncle Skeleton ^(talk) 03:26, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Bickertonite)?

Interested parties who voiced opinions on this in the past, read all about it - the raging debate on moving the article on the definitely-not-Bickertonite Church of Jesus Christ has flared up again, at Talk:The_Church_of_Jesus_Christ#Requested_move.2C_take_two. Come back for more fun and games if you care to - thanks for playing... - Reaverdrop _(talk/nl) 04:59, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ICCmemberstatesworldmap102007.png

Hi Sesmith, I notice you're pretty good with maps — if you get the chance, could you change Chad to green on the ICC map? Cheers, Sideshow Bob Roberts 01:42, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the delay. Should be done now. SESmith 04:40, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Sideshow Bob Roberts 03:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for map work

		The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
		Fantastic work on the LDS map. That was a great addition to the LDS Church article. COGDEN 18:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-

this

This image that you uploaded apparently has Virginia in dark blue (indicating it has a church in the boundaries of the state) which is incorrect and should be light blue. The issue was brought up here and I thought I'd tell you. I could fix it, but I don't know how the licensing for the image would work out. Thanks ~ Bella Swan 00:29, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, fixed. SESmith 04:35, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles have more than 12 members?

SESmith, I finally decided to bite the bullet and go ahead and share with you the page you never saw. It follows below. It mostly contains relevant quotes from Church leaders on this issue. I hope it clarifies my position. Also note that comments made by me about the content or editorial revisions are contained in brackets. That said, here it is:

[A common misconception in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints is that the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles cannot have more than 12 members. The following document, obtained by my from my institute instructor, was put together for our institute class by C. Max Caldwell, a former member of the Second Quorum of the Seventy and currently serving as a sealer in the Mount Timpanogos Utah Temple of the Church.]

Members of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles

There can be more than twelve members in the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles.

Elder Bruce R. McConkie made the following statement: "The proper course for all of us is to stay in the mainstream of the Church. This is the Lord's Church, and it is led by the spirit of inspiration, and the practice of the Church constitutes the interpretation of the scripture." (Bruce R. McConkie, Doctrines of the Restoration, pg. 66)

Following are examples of "the practice of the Church" constituting "the interpretation of the scripture" as it relates to the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles.

April 1970 General Conference

President Harold B. Lee, First Counselor in the First Presidency and President of the Quorum of the Twelve, made the following statement concerning the sustaining of President Joseph Fielding Smith as the new President of the Church.

"Today's happenings have brought to me some of the most sobering reflections of my whole life. During the last ten weeks that have elapsed since the momentous spiritual experience, in company with 13 of my brethren holding the holy apostleship, in an upper room of the temple, where members of the new Presidency of the Church were chosen and ordained, I have lived my whole life in retrospect and the days ahead in prospect, to some extent." (Conference Report, April 1970, page 125)

During this same conference, President Spencer W. Kimball, Acting President of the Quorum of the Twelve, made the following comment: " Then dawns the notable day (January 23, 1970), and 14 serious men walk reverently into the temple of God-this, the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, the governing body of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, several of whom have experienced this solemn change before." (Conference Report, April 1970, page 118)

Sunday, December 30, 1973

President N. Eldon Tanner in explaining the process by which a successor is chosen to be President of the Church made the following statement:

"I would like to explain to you exactly what took place following the unexpected death of President Harold B. Lee on 26 December 1973. I was in Phoenix, Arizona, to spend Christmas with my daughter and her family, when a call came to me from Arthur Haycock, secretary to President Lee. He said that President Lee was seriously ill, and he thought that I should plan to return home as soon as possible. A half-hour later he called and said: 'The Lord has spoken. President Lee has been called home.'

"Following President Lee's funeral, President Kimball called a meeting of all of the Apostles for Sunday, December 30, at 3 p.m. in the Salt Lake Temple Council Room. President Romney and I had taken our respective places of seniority in the council, so there were fourteen of us present." (L. G. Otten and C. M. Caldwell, Sacred Truths of the Doctrine and Covenants, volume 2, pages 228-229.)

[With the foregoing information, especially in light of the Bruce R. McConkie quote the information started with and the quotes from Presidents Lee, Kimball, and Tanner, it has now been proven beyond reasonable doubt that the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles can and does have more than twelve members at times. Accordingly, it is my suggestion that the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles page for Wikipedia be revised to accord with this new information. Unless a concrete argument (just one statement from a General Authority would do the trick) is presented against such a proposition, that would be my heartiest recommendation. E-mail me your opinion or leave it on my talk page either way. Respectfully Submitted, --Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable 20:55, 3 November 2007 (UTC)][reply]

the Latter Day Saint Wikia

Hey, the the Latter Day Saint Wikia is in desprerate need of editors. I just joined about 5 minutes ago and was wondering if you could too. ~ Bella Swan 03:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kolob / If You Could Hie to Kolob merge

Care to weigh in? Talk:Kolob#Merger proposal You were one of the most recent editors of If You Could Hie to Kolob. Descartes1979 (talk) 19:55, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:People convicted of aggression

Category:People convicted of aggression, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Cgingold (talk) 05:04, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Richardrlyman.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Richardrlyman.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 00:48, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mormonism and history merge proposal

Please weigh in on the merger proposal between History of the Latter Day Saint movement and Mormonism and history. I saw that you were a recent contributor of one of the pages in question, and thought you would be interested.--Descartes1979 (talk) 21:25, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jamesetalmage.gif

I have tagged Image:Jamesetalmage.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 17:36, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Johnawidtsoe.gif

I have tagged Image:Johnawidtsoe.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 20:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LDSJosephanderson.jpg

I have tagged Image:LDSJosephanderson.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 14:14, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Albertcarrington.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Albertcarrington.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lupo 10:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: Please note that there's also a much better version now used at Albert Carrington. Cheers, Lupo 10:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Proposal

As you are a recent editor of the articles in question, please see my merge proposal of Hugh Nibley and Egyptian names in the Book of Mormon - thanks. --Descartes1979 (talk) 04:55, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

After discussion and a second look, I am changing my proposal to merge with Linguistics and the Book of Mormon#Egyptian names. That is a much more natural fit for the content of Egyptian Names in the Book of Mormon. See the new discussion here. --Descartes1979 (talk) 21:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Map

Nice map. How did you make it? Was it with free software or purchased? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sukee2 (talk • contribs) 12:28, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Matthewcowley.jpg

I have tagged Image:Matthewcowley.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 21:09, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Markepeterson.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Markepeterson.jpg. Unfortunately, I think that you have not provided a proper rationale for using this image under "fair use". Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. Note that the image description page must include the exact name or a link to each article the image is used in and a separate rationale for each one. (If a link is used, automated processes may improperly add the related tag to the image. Please change the fair use template to refer to the exact name, if you see this warning.)

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:57, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lymanejohnson.jpg

I have tagged Image:Lymanejohnson.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 15:03, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Orsonfwhitney.jpg

I have tagged Image:Orsonfwhitney.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 14:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Neldontanner.jpg

I have tagged Image:Neldontanner.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 12:01, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Albertebowen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Albertebowen.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:31, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Alonzoahinckley.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Alonzoahinckley.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:10, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Alvinrdyer.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Alvinrdyer.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:49, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bryantshinckley.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bryantshinckley.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:45, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Church Historian and Recorder

Hi; as the original author, I thought you might be able to help with some questions that have arisen at Talk:Church Historian and Recorder. Thanks. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 21:59, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Change to List of temples of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints by geographic region

As a significant contributor to the List of temples of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints by geographic region page, I wanted to be sure you knew that I've implemented a version of this page using the data templates that are used for the other temple lists/pages at User:Trödel/Sandbox3. I plan to replace the current geographic list with this change later this week. --Trödel 01:50, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Abrahamowoodruff.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Abrahamowoodruff.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:16, 17 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 10:16, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Abrahamowoodruff.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Abrahamowoodruff.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:22, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

a request

look at my profile - the sandbox entry on Exaltation. And read the references. I want your input on the wording. I feel a few of the phrases are a bit awkward.

And I also want you to read the references and understand some things about the LDS beleif on becoming Gods, that they do indeed teach that humans can progress to godhood and rule worlds, much as they beleive Heavenly Father was once a man who became a god, the God of this world Alienburrito (talk) 06:47, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Young family

CfD nomination of Category:Richards family

Latter Day Church of Christ the Lamb listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Latter Day Church of Christ the Lamb. Since you had some involvement with the Latter Day Church of Christ the Lamb redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). 17:00, 29 March 2010 (UTC)--ARTEST4ECHO ^talk

Fair use rationale for File:Cannosq1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cannosq1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:14, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Charlesacallis.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Charlesacallis.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:29, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Firstpresidency1901.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Firstpresidency1901.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

FYI: A pubic domain image depicing the same three people only in 1905 was already avaible for use on the John R. Winder page. --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 20:45, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Johnfboynton.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Johnfboynton.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

A Public Domain image has been uploaded, so fair use image was removed from John F. Boynton page.--ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 14:04, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Charlescrich.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Charlescrich.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:03, 28 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:03, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Delbertlstapley.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Delbertlstapley.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 02:32, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Eldredgsmith.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Eldredgsmith.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 17:52, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Charlesacallis.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Charlesacallis.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 17:56, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Josephfmerrill.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Josephfmerrill.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 17:56, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Richardrlyman.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Richardrlyman.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 17:56, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Marvinjashton.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Marvinjashton.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 17:56, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Areas map

The map you made for Area (LDS Church) is gone. Do you know what the story is? Is there a good reason? Because I agree there should be one and the article still refers to a map even though it is gone. Thmazing (talk) 23:23, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ordination reason

I'm not sure where there might be a discussion on this so I'm coming to you because you are One Who Knows when it comes to LDS/Wikipedia stuff.

I don't know how in the info box for apostles it says Ordination reason followed by something like "Death of Joseph B. Wirthlin". Elder Wirthlin's dead is not the reason Elder Anderson was ordained --- his death is merely the reason there was an opening.

Something like Reason for opening (though clunky) would be more accurate.

What do you think? Thmazing (talk) 21:43, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Legrandrichards.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Legrandrichards.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 15:19, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stephenlrichards.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stephenlrichards.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 15:19, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Albertcarrington.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Albertcarrington.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:21, 22 October 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO ^{(talk|contribs)} 15:21, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request to update file

Per this reference could you possibly update the image here to include Iraq as a State Party to the convention. To my understanding of the reference provided, Iraq is a party with declared stockpiles of agent. My76 Strat 21:54, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done This request was accomplished by another editor. My76 Strat 05:17, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Smithjf3.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Smithjf3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:42, 27 December 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:42, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SpencerWKimball.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SpencerWKimball.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:58, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:George Reynolds (Mormon).png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:George Reynolds (Mormon).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 15:11, 13 January 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Matthiasfcowley.gif

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Matthiasfcowley.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 22:32, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Georgealbertsmith.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Georgealbertsmith.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 20:21, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Emmelinebwells.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Emmelinebwells.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 21:54, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! A request for your input

Per wp:CANVASSING, this is a neutrally worded notice being sent, without any type of "selection" bias, to everyone that edited fairly recently the MOS page about how to term the Latter Day Saints denominations on Wikipedia in the belief that your various and collective expertise or expertises, if that's a plural, can help us improve its wording, if possible. a bit. The most pertinent section is here. And the issue is to what degree the terms "Mormon church" and "LDS church" relate to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, in specific, and to what kind of sourcing should be used to document this. Thanks, if you find time and the interest to look into the matter and offer your opinion or commentary.--Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden (talk) 23:10, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Firstpresidency1928.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Firstpresidency1928.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 14:04, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brucermcconkie.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brucermcconkie.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 19:57, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Paulhdunn.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paulhdunn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 21:19, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NealAMaxwell.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NealAMaxwell.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:17, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Hyrummsmith.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Hyrummsmith.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 15:40, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ruthmayfox.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ruthmayfox.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 18:03, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Presiding Patriarch

I was wondering if I could have your input at Talk:Presiding Patriarch. I am confused as to the status of "Asahel Smith" and I know you are very Knowledgeable in LDS Church history, so you may be able to clear up my confusion.--ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 20:18, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Emmelinebwells.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Emmelinebwells.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 13:46, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Hyrumgsmith.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Hyrumgsmith.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 13:46, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Mosesthatcher.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Mosesthatcher.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 14:23, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michael A. Neider

The article Michael A. Neider has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Padillah (talk) 18:39, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Favor

Hi. I started an article which I knew was of questionable notability, but it's turned into a ≥50% discussion on whether I hate people who aren't Mormon. Probably the real problem is that only two people are involved which I suppose can make it seem personal. I wonder if you would mind weighing in? And perhaps advising me on whether I should just step away from the conversation? Thanks. *cc Good Olfactory Snocrates* Thmazing (talk) 23:31, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for the Wikipedia Picture

Hello, My name is Duane Hurst and I recently made a free (non-commercial) English web site to share information with people. I added links to your Wikipedia/Wikimedia freeware picture. I also gave credit to you on my web pages for your work. Thank you for sharing with the public. My website is:

http://www.freeenglishsite.com/

I also am a "Mormon" and my web site has a Mormon section that contains my Book of Mormon map (pictures of actual locations), my translation of Egyptian hieroglyphs from the Book of Abraham, and other items. I have shared and discussed these with various LDS general authorities and given many fireside presentations about them in Japan, Thailand and USA. My web site sections about the USA and World also have LDS membership and temple information for each country.

I add pictures such as yours to one of the following major sections of my site: 1. World section - contains information and over 10,000 images of every world country and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/index.htm

2. USA section - contains information and images of every USA state and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/usa/index.htm

3. English section - "Mel and Wes" lessons in conversation format. Stories are located in various USA states and world countries such as China, England, Germany, Japan, Mexico and Thailand. Each lesson has many slang terms and idioms, which I link to my Slang Dictionary. This eventually will have over 5,000 terms. Currently, it has about 3,000 slang and idioms. I regularly add new lessons and slang terms. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/lessons/index.htm Slang Dictionary link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/slang/Eslang_a.htm

Prior to retirement, I taught English at several private and public universities in the United States.

Please share this free site with your friends. I hope all will enjoy the pictures and find the English information useful. Sincerely, Duane Hurst in Utah, USA

Email address: duanerhurst@freeenglishsite.com --75.169.8.9 (talk) 16:03, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elaine S. Dalton

The article Elaine S. Dalton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN. Nothing non-LDS-connected as a source

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. p b p 19:05, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kimball–Snow–Woolley family

The article Kimball–Snow–Woolley family has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article is an arbitrarily defined stand-alone list that fails to meet the notability criteria of WP:LISTN in that there is no evidence cited that the topic has been discussed as a group or set by any sources whatsoever let alone any independent reliable ones.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 92.25.21.108 (talk) 19:26, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Johnepage.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Johnepage.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 20:31, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johnepage.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Johnepage.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First Presidentcy (Latter Day Saints)

A tag has been placed on First Presidentcy (Latter Day Saints), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ARTEST4ECHO (talk) 17:34, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bishops of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Category:Bishops of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. p b p 15:33, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Animals in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Animals in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Since you had some involvement with the Animals in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 19:04, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William D. Oswald for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William D. Oswald is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William D. Oswald until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. p b p 22:04, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In some benign wp:CANVASSING

Community input is politely requested for Jimbo's tkpg with regard ur expertise in gen. notability per wp:GNG & applicabilities of eg wp:PROF, wp:AUTH, etc. w/in AfD's
... here: User talk:Jimbo Wales#Suggested fix.--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 00:50, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dean R. Burgess for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dean R. Burgess is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dean R. Burgess until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Patricia P. Pinegar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patricia P. Pinegar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia P. Pinegar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:12, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mary Ellen W. Smoot for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mary Ellen W. Smoot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Ellen W. Smoot until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:25, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Silvia H. Allred for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Silvia H. Allred is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silvia H. Allred until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:07, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Augusto A. Lim for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Augusto A. Lim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Augusto A. Lim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:05, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Barbara Thompson (Mormon) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barbara Thompson (Mormon) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Thompson (Mormon) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:32, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Margaret S. Lifferth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Margaret S. Lifferth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret S. Lifferth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:35, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ángel Abrea for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ángel Abrea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ángel Abrea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:54, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tai Kwok Yuen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tai Kwok Yuen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tai Kwok Yuen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:59, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charles A. Didier for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles A. Didier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles A. Didier until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:30, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Margaret D. Nadauld for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Margaret D. Nadauld is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret D. Nadauld until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:05, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Han In Sang for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Han In Sang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Han In Sang until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:08, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cheryl C. Lant for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cheryl C. Lant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheryl C. Lant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vicki F. Matsumori for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vicki F. Matsumori is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vicki F. Matsumori until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:47, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Patricia P. Pinegar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patricia P. Pinegar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia P. Pinegar (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:00, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ángel Abrea for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ángel Abrea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ángel Abrea (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:35, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bonnie D. Parkin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bonnie D. Parkin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonnie D. Parkin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:22, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elaine L. Jack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elaine L. Jack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elaine L. Jack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:32, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Earl C. Tingey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Earl C. Tingey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earl C. Tingey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:36, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christoffel Golden Jr. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christoffel Golden Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christoffel Golden Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:57, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael A. Neider for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael A. Neider is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael A. Neider until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:43, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of A. Roger Merrill for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A. Roger Merrill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. Roger Merrill until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:59, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John H. Vandenberg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John H. Vandenberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John H. Vandenberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:49, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adney Y. Komatsu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adney Y. Komatsu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adney Y. Komatsu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:23, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Richard G. Hinckley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard G. Hinckley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard G. Hinckley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:59, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ángel Abrea for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ángel Abrea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ángel Abrea (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. p b p 14:04, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hans B. Ringger for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hans B. Ringger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans B. Ringger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rollidan (talk) 19:52, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Letter of appointment

A tag has been placed on Letter of appointment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Redirect left behind in error. See Talk:Letter of appointment (Mormonism)#Requested move 21 August 2023

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:33, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Prophet, seer, and revelator for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prophet, seer, and revelator is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prophet, seer, and revelator until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Big Money Threepwood (talk) 06:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]