Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Destination Architects and Designers
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 02:39, Feb 13, 2005 (UTC)
Ad for a non-notable organisation. Destination architect is an alleged neologism (see this VfD for details). --Deathphoenix 14:53, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep, if other such association/organisations are referenced, otherwise remove
- The above vote is by the anon author, 128.173.124.43 who, despite the actions on other articles, did not blank this article or its VfD notice. --Deathphoenix 03:06, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. JoaoRicardo 19:39, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as non-extant. humblefool® 20:32, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Now the anon contributor started spamming wikipedia with numerous "destination arhitects". Mikkalai 21:32, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete: promo. Delete the articles on individual destination architects as well. Wile E. Heresiarch 04:47, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 05:42, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.